CN vs. KLIP
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP).
CN and KLIP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CN is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the MSCI China All Shares. It was launched on Apr 30, 2014. KLIP is managed by CICC. It was launched on Jan 12, 2023.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CN or KLIP.
Key characteristics
| CN | KLIP | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -57.14% | -0.01% |
| 1Y Return | -43.75% | 6.42% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.12 | 0.44 |
| Daily Std Dev | 146.77% | 15.68% |
| Max Drawdown | -99.11% | -10.39% |
| Current Drawdown | -89.29% | -6.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between CN and KLIP is -0.08. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Performance
CN vs. KLIP - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CN achieves a -57.14% return, which is significantly lower than KLIP's -0.01% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CN vs. KLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
CN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than KLIP's 0.95% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CN vs. KLIP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CN vs. KLIP - Dividend Comparison
CN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13,715.87%, more than KLIP's 55.97% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF | 13,715.87% | 235.17% | 61.66% | 530.55% | 159.04% | 3,205.11% | 989.83% | 318.27% | 2,808.84% | 4,168.13% | 888.58% |
KLIP KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF | 55.97% | 61.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CN vs. KLIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CN drawdown since its inception was -99.11%, which is greater than KLIP's maximum drawdown of -10.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CN and KLIP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CN vs. KLIP - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN) has a higher volatility of 28.42% compared to KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) at 4.59%. This indicates that CN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KLIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.