CN vs. DVYA
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN) and iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA).
CN and DVYA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CN is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the MSCI China All Shares. It was launched on Apr 30, 2014. DVYA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones Asia/Pacific Select Dividend 30 Index. It was launched on Feb 23, 2012. Both CN and DVYA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CN or DVYA.
Key characteristics
| CN | DVYA | |
|---|---|---|
| Daily Std Dev | 88.19% | 13.92% |
| Max Drawdown | -30.00% | -45.62% |
| Current Drawdown | -30.00% | -3.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between CN and DVYA is 0.00, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CN vs. DVYA - Performance Comparison
The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CN vs. DVYA - Expense Ratio Comparison
CN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than DVYA's 0.49% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CN vs. DVYA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN) and iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Not enough dataDividends
CN vs. DVYA - Dividend Comparison
CN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17,634.69%, more than DVYA's 6.15% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF | 17,634.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DVYA iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF | 6.15% | 6.48% | 7.30% | 5.81% | 3.66% | 5.52% | 6.24% | 4.74% | 4.80% | 5.33% | 5.28% | 5.63% |
Drawdowns
CN vs. DVYA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CN drawdown since its inception was -30.00%, smaller than the maximum DVYA drawdown of -45.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CN and DVYA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CN vs. DVYA - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN) has a higher volatility of 17.63% compared to iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA) at 4.24%. This indicates that CN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DVYA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.