CN vs. DVYA
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN) and iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA).
CN and DVYA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CN is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the MSCI China All Shares. It was launched on Apr 30, 2014. DVYA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones Asia/Pacific Select Dividend 30 Index. It was launched on Feb 23, 2012. Both CN and DVYA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CN or DVYA.
Key characteristics
| CN | DVYA | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -64.29% | 6.23% |
| 1Y Return | -25.00% | 19.29% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -11.56% | 3.49% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 35.86% | 3.56% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 10.19% | 1.16% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.20 | 1.35 |
| Daily Std Dev | 147.99% | 13.90% |
| Max Drawdown | -99.11% | -45.62% |
| Current Drawdown | -91.07% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between CN and DVYA is -0.05. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Performance
CN vs. DVYA - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CN achieves a -64.29% return, which is significantly lower than DVYA's 6.23% return. Over the past 10 years, CN has outperformed DVYA with an annualized return of 10.19%, while DVYA has yielded a comparatively lower 1.16% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CN vs. DVYA - Expense Ratio Comparison
CN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than DVYA's 0.49% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CN vs. DVYA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN) and iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CN vs. DVYA - Dividend Comparison
CN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16,459.04%, more than DVYA's 5.97% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF | 16,459.04% | 235.17% | 61.66% | 530.55% | 159.04% | 3,205.11% | 989.83% | 318.27% | 2,808.84% | 4,168.13% | 888.58% | 0.00% |
DVYA iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF | 5.97% | 6.48% | 7.29% | 5.81% | 3.66% | 5.52% | 6.24% | 4.74% | 4.79% | 5.33% | 5.28% | 5.63% |
Drawdowns
CN vs. DVYA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CN drawdown since its inception was -99.11%, which is greater than DVYA's maximum drawdown of -45.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CN and DVYA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CN vs. DVYA - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN) has a higher volatility of 34.84% compared to iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA) at 4.08%. This indicates that CN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DVYA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.