CMS vs. NKE
CMS (CMS Energy Corporation) and NKE (NIKE, Inc.) are both stocks. CMS operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities), while NKE operates in Footwear & Accessories (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, CMS returned 8.55%/yr vs -0.48%/yr for NKE. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CMS vs. NKE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMS achieves a 6.82% return, which is significantly higher than NKE's -28.37% return. Over the past 10 years, CMS has outperformed NKE with an annualized return of 8.55%, while NKE has yielded a comparatively lower -0.48% annualized return.
CMS
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- 2.69%
- YTD
- 6.82%
- 6M
- 6.95%
- 1Y
- 7.49%
- 3Y*
- 10.50%
- 5Y*
- 7.32%
- 10Y*
- 8.55%
NKE
- 1D
- -2.24%
- 1M
- 8.24%
- YTD
- -28.37%
- 6M
- -32.37%
- 1Y
- -23.74%
- 3Y*
- -23.49%
- 5Y*
- -18.04%
- 10Y*
- -0.48%
CMS vs. NKE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMS CMS Energy Corporation | 6.82% | 8.13% | 18.60% | -5.21% | 0.84% | 9.71% | -0.32% | 30.04% | 8.25% | 17.03% |
NKE NIKE, Inc. | -28.37% | -13.83% | -29.11% | -6.01% | -29.04% | 18.70% | 40.97% | 38.09% | 19.87% | 24.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMS and NKE is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1984 | 0.20 |
The correlation between CMS and NKE shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CMS:
$4.92
NKE:
$1.52
CMS:
14.95
NKE:
29.55
CMS:
1.88
NKE:
1.43
CMS:
$8.82B
NKE:
$46.52B
CMS:
$4.16B
NKE:
$18.99B
CMS:
$3.09B
NKE:
$3.33B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMS vs. NKE — Risk / Return Rank
CMS
NKE
CMS vs. NKE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) and NIKE, Inc. (NKE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CMS | NKE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 0.89 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.62 | -0.58 | +1.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.61 | -1.09 | +2.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CMS vs. NKE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMS drawdown since its inception was -91.20%, which is greater than NKE's maximum drawdown of -75.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMS and NKE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMS | NKE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.20% | -75.19% | -16.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.48% | -46.18% | +34.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.61% | -64.21% | +44.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.56% | -74.64% | +47.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.55% | -74.64% | +45.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.25% | -72.55% | +65.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.34% | -20.93% | -6.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.42% | 24.38% | -19.96% |
Volatility
CMS vs. NKE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) is 7.02%, while NIKE, Inc. (NKE) has a volatility of 10.43%. This indicates that CMS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NKE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMS | NKE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.02% | 10.43% | -3.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.53% | 29.43% | -16.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.28% | 38.48% | -22.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.95% | 35.91% | -16.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.71% | 32.29% | -11.58% |
Dividends
CMS vs. NKE - Dividend Comparison
CMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, less than NKE's 3.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMS CMS Energy Corporation | 3.02% | 3.10% | 3.09% | 3.36% | 3.62% | 2.67% | 2.67% | 2.43% | 2.88% | 2.81% | 2.98% | 3.22% |
NKE NIKE, Inc. | 3.63% | 2.53% | 2.00% | 1.28% | 1.07% | 0.68% | 0.71% | 0.89% | 1.11% | 1.18% | 1.30% | 0.93% |
Financials
CMS vs. NKE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CMS Energy Corporation and NIKE, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CMS vs. NKE - Profitability Comparison
CMS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CMS Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.73B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
NKE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NIKE, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.53B and revenue of 11.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.2%.
CMS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CMS Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 490.00M and revenue of 2.73B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.0%.
NKE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NIKE, Inc. reported an operating income of 553.00M and revenue of 11.28B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.
CMS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CMS Energy Corporation reported a net income of 340.00M and revenue of 2.73B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
NKE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NIKE, Inc. reported a net income of 520.00M and revenue of 11.28B, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CMS and NKE have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NKE has higher volatility (10.43%) compared to CMS (7.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMS dropped -91.20% vs NKE's -75.19%.
CMS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CMS and NKE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer