PortfoliosLab logo
CMS vs. AEE
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CMS and AEE is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

CMS vs. AEE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) and Ameren Corporation (AEE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CMS:

0.95

AEE:

1.86

Sortino Ratio

CMS:

1.45

AEE:

2.50

Omega Ratio

CMS:

1.18

AEE:

1.33

Calmar Ratio

CMS:

1.27

AEE:

1.44

Martin Ratio

CMS:

4.35

AEE:

10.04

Ulcer Index

CMS:

4.17%

AEE:

3.50%

Daily Std Dev

CMS:

17.63%

AEE:

19.07%

Max Drawdown

CMS:

-91.20%

AEE:

-60.57%

Current Drawdown

CMS:

-4.64%

AEE:

-4.77%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CMS:

$21.21B

AEE:

$26.17B

EPS

CMS:

$3.38

AEE:

$4.51

PE Ratio

CMS:

20.98

AEE:

21.47

PEG Ratio

CMS:

2.87

AEE:

2.37

PS Ratio

CMS:

2.72

AEE:

3.45

PB Ratio

CMS:

2.61

AEE:

2.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

CMS:

$7.79B

AEE:

$7.90B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CMS:

$3.05B

AEE:

$4.88B

EBITDA (TTM)

CMS:

$3.15B

AEE:

$3.58B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMS achieves a 8.89% return, which is significantly lower than AEE's 10.75% return. Over the past 10 years, CMS has underperformed AEE with an annualized return of 10.95%, while AEE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.57% annualized return.


CMS

YTD

8.89%

1M

-0.22%

6M

6.36%

1Y

16.70%

5Y*

9.17%

10Y*

10.95%

AEE

YTD

10.75%

1M

0.02%

6M

9.03%

1Y

35.11%

5Y*

10.52%

10Y*

12.57%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CMS vs. AEE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CMS is 8181
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CMS is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CMS is 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CMS is 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CMS is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CMS is 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

AEE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AEE is 9292
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AEE is 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AEE is 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AEE is 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AEE is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AEE is 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CMS vs. AEE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) and Ameren Corporation (AEE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CMS Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the AEE Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMS and AEE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CMS vs. AEE - Dividend Comparison

CMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, more than AEE's 2.77% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CMS
CMS Energy Corporation
2.96%3.09%3.36%2.91%2.67%2.67%2.43%2.88%2.81%2.98%3.22%3.11%
AEE
Ameren Corporation
2.77%3.01%3.48%2.65%2.47%2.56%2.50%2.83%3.01%3.27%3.83%3.49%

Drawdowns

CMS vs. AEE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMS drawdown since its inception was -91.20%, which is greater than AEE's maximum drawdown of -60.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMS and AEE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CMS vs. AEE - Volatility Comparison

CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) has a higher volatility of 6.80% compared to Ameren Corporation (AEE) at 5.82%. This indicates that CMS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AEE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CMS vs. AEE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CMS Energy Corporation and Ameren Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.40B1.60B1.80B2.00B2.20B2.40B20212022202320242025
2.45B
2.10B
(CMS) Total Revenue
(AEE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CMS vs. AEE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CMS Energy Corporation and Ameren Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
42.7%
100.0%
(CMS) Gross Margin
(AEE) Gross Margin
CMS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CMS Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.04B and revenue of 2.45B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.7%.

AEE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ameren Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.10B and revenue of 2.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

CMS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CMS Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 494.00M and revenue of 2.45B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.2%.

AEE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ameren Corporation reported an operating income of 430.00M and revenue of 2.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.5%.

CMS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CMS Energy Corporation reported a net income of 304.00M and revenue of 2.45B, resulting in a net margin of 12.4%.

AEE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ameren Corporation reported a net income of 289.00M and revenue of 2.10B, resulting in a net margin of 13.8%.