PortfoliosLab logo
CMS vs. LNT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CMS and LNT is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

CMS vs. LNT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) and Alliant Energy Corporation (LNT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CMS:

0.79

LNT:

1.13

Sortino Ratio

CMS:

1.14

LNT:

1.58

Omega Ratio

CMS:

1.14

LNT:

1.22

Calmar Ratio

CMS:

0.96

LNT:

1.20

Martin Ratio

CMS:

3.30

LNT:

4.82

Ulcer Index

CMS:

4.14%

LNT:

4.53%

Daily Std Dev

CMS:

17.37%

LNT:

19.38%

Max Drawdown

CMS:

-91.20%

LNT:

-51.66%

Current Drawdown

CMS:

-8.21%

LNT:

-7.67%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CMS:

$20.71B

LNT:

$15.53B

EPS

CMS:

$3.38

LNT:

$2.90

PE Ratio

CMS:

20.49

LNT:

20.85

PEG Ratio

CMS:

2.80

LNT:

1.93

PS Ratio

CMS:

2.66

LNT:

3.81

PB Ratio

CMS:

2.55

LNT:

2.19

Total Revenue (TTM)

CMS:

$7.79B

LNT:

$4.08B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CMS:

$3.05B

LNT:

$1.84B

EBITDA (TTM)

CMS:

$3.15B

LNT:

$1.85B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMS achieves a 4.80% return, which is significantly higher than LNT's 3.99% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CMS having a 10.65% annualized return and LNT not far behind at 10.59%.


CMS

YTD

4.80%

1M

-5.74%

6M

3.19%

1Y

13.69%

5Y*

8.35%

10Y*

10.65%

LNT

YTD

3.99%

1M

-1.36%

6M

2.26%

1Y

21.76%

5Y*

9.14%

10Y*

10.59%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CMS vs. LNT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CMS is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CMS is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CMS is 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CMS is 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CMS is 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CMS is 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

LNT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LNT is 8383
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LNT is 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LNT is 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LNT is 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LNT is 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LNT is 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CMS vs. LNT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) and Alliant Energy Corporation (LNT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CMS Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is comparable to the LNT Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMS and LNT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CMS vs. LNT - Dividend Comparison

CMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, less than LNT's 3.27% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CMS
CMS Energy Corporation
3.07%3.09%3.36%2.91%2.67%2.67%2.43%2.88%2.81%2.98%3.22%3.11%
LNT
Alliant Energy Corporation
3.27%3.25%3.53%3.10%2.62%2.95%2.60%3.17%2.96%3.10%3.52%3.07%

Drawdowns

CMS vs. LNT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMS drawdown since its inception was -91.20%, which is greater than LNT's maximum drawdown of -51.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMS and LNT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CMS vs. LNT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) is 6.02%, while Alliant Energy Corporation (LNT) has a volatility of 6.71%. This indicates that CMS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LNT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CMS vs. LNT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CMS Energy Corporation and Alliant Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20212022202320242025
2.45B
1.13B
(CMS) Total Revenue
(LNT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CMS vs. LNT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CMS Energy Corporation and Alliant Energy Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20212022202320242025
42.7%
44.2%
(CMS) Gross Margin
(LNT) Gross Margin
CMS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CMS Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.04B and revenue of 2.45B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.7%.

LNT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Alliant Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 498.00M and revenue of 1.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.2%.

CMS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CMS Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 494.00M and revenue of 2.45B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.2%.

LNT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Alliant Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 257.00M and revenue of 1.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.8%.

CMS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CMS Energy Corporation reported a net income of 304.00M and revenue of 2.45B, resulting in a net margin of 12.4%.

LNT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Alliant Energy Corporation reported a net income of 213.00M and revenue of 1.13B, resulting in a net margin of 18.9%.