PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CMS vs. LNT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CMSLNT
YTD Return5.11%-1.12%
1Y Return1.41%-4.83%
3Y Return (Ann)1.21%-0.59%
5Y Return (Ann)4.97%4.50%
10Y Return (Ann)10.48%8.92%
Sharpe Ratio-0.00-0.35
Daily Std Dev18.83%18.93%
Max Drawdown-91.20%-51.66%
Current Drawdown-12.36%-17.62%

Fundamentals


CMSLNT
Market Cap$17.78B$12.77B
EPS$3.01$2.78
PE Ratio19.7817.92
PEG Ratio2.232.48
Revenue (TTM)$7.46B$4.03B
Gross Profit (TTM)$2.76B$1.71B
EBITDA (TTM)$2.47B$1.59B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between CMS and LNT is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

CMS vs. LNT - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CMS achieves a 5.11% return, which is significantly higher than LNT's -1.12% return. Over the past 10 years, CMS has outperformed LNT with an annualized return of 10.48%, while LNT has yielded a comparatively lower 8.92% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
11.61%
2.83%
CMS
LNT

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CMS Energy Corporation

Alliant Energy Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CMS vs. LNT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) and Alliant Energy Corporation (LNT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CMS, currently valued at -0.00, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.00
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CMS, currently valued at 0.13, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.13
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CMS, currently valued at 1.01, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.02
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CMS, currently valued at -0.00, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.00
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CMS, currently valued at -0.01, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.01
LNT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LNT, currently valued at -0.35, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.35
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LNT, currently valued at -0.36, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.36
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LNT, currently valued at 0.96, compared to the broader market0.501.001.500.96
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LNT, currently valued at -0.26, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.26
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LNT, currently valued at -0.79, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.79

CMS vs. LNT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMS Sharpe Ratio is -0.00, which is higher than the LNT Sharpe Ratio of -0.35. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of CMS and LNT.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.60-0.40-0.200.000.20NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-0.00
-0.35
CMS
LNT

Dividends

CMS vs. LNT - Dividend Comparison

CMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, less than LNT's 3.66% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CMS
CMS Energy Corporation
3.27%3.36%2.91%2.67%2.67%2.43%2.88%2.81%2.98%3.22%3.11%3.81%
LNT
Alliant Energy Corporation
3.66%3.53%3.10%2.62%2.95%2.60%3.17%2.96%3.10%3.52%3.07%3.64%

Drawdowns

CMS vs. LNT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMS drawdown since its inception was -91.20%, which is greater than LNT's maximum drawdown of -51.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMS and LNT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-24.00%-22.00%-20.00%-18.00%-16.00%-14.00%-12.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-12.36%
-17.62%
CMS
LNT

Volatility

CMS vs. LNT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) is 5.38%, while Alliant Energy Corporation (LNT) has a volatility of 6.23%. This indicates that CMS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LNT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
5.38%
6.23%
CMS
LNT

Financials

CMS vs. LNT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CMS Energy Corporation and Alliant Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items