CMS vs. LNT
Compare and contrast key facts about CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) and Alliant Energy Corporation (LNT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CMS or LNT.
Correlation
The correlation between CMS and LNT is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CMS vs. LNT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CMS:
1.26
LNT:
1.22
CMS:
1.79
LNT:
1.76
CMS:
1.22
LNT:
1.23
CMS:
1.02
LNT:
0.97
CMS:
5.99
LNT:
5.37
CMS:
3.43%
LNT:
4.03%
CMS:
16.30%
LNT:
17.71%
CMS:
-91.20%
LNT:
-51.66%
CMS:
-6.91%
LNT:
-7.36%
Fundamentals
CMS:
$20.03B
LNT:
$15.29B
CMS:
$3.51
LNT:
$2.57
CMS:
19.10
LNT:
23.18
CMS:
2.43
LNT:
2.36
CMS:
$7.48B
LNT:
$3.97B
CMS:
$2.52B
LNT:
$1.22B
CMS:
$3.03B
LNT:
$1.73B
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CMS having a 18.53% return and LNT slightly higher at 19.15%. Over the past 10 years, CMS has outperformed LNT with an annualized return of 9.95%, while LNT has yielded a comparatively lower 9.38% annualized return.
CMS
18.53%
-2.79%
13.59%
20.95%
4.16%
9.95%
LNT
19.15%
-5.27%
17.65%
20.87%
4.68%
9.38%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CMS vs. LNT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) and Alliant Energy Corporation (LNT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CMS vs. LNT - Dividend Comparison
CMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%, less than LNT's 3.26% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMS CMS Energy Corporation | 3.09% | 3.36% | 2.91% | 2.67% | 2.67% | 2.43% | 2.88% | 2.81% | 2.98% | 3.22% | 3.11% | 3.81% |
LNT Alliant Energy Corporation | 3.26% | 3.53% | 3.10% | 2.62% | 2.95% | 2.60% | 3.17% | 2.96% | 3.10% | 3.52% | 3.07% | 3.64% |
Drawdowns
CMS vs. LNT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMS drawdown since its inception was -91.20%, which is greater than LNT's maximum drawdown of -51.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMS and LNT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CMS vs. LNT - Volatility Comparison
CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) has a higher volatility of 4.19% compared to Alliant Energy Corporation (LNT) at 3.87%. This indicates that CMS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LNT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CMS vs. LNT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CMS Energy Corporation and Alliant Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities