PortfoliosLab logo
CMS vs. CPK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CMS and CPK is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.2

Performance

CMS vs. CPK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) and Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%2,000.00%4,000.00%6,000.00%8,000.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
540.91%
7,152.18%
CMS
CPK

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CMS:

1.42

CPK:

1.39

Sortino Ratio

CMS:

1.93

CPK:

1.97

Omega Ratio

CMS:

1.25

CPK:

1.24

Calmar Ratio

CMS:

1.69

CPK:

1.11

Martin Ratio

CMS:

5.98

CPK:

6.00

Ulcer Index

CMS:

4.04%

CPK:

4.70%

Daily Std Dev

CMS:

16.98%

CPK:

20.30%

Max Drawdown

CMS:

-91.20%

CPK:

-38.67%

Current Drawdown

CMS:

-3.44%

CPK:

-2.92%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CMS:

$21.83B

CPK:

$3.04B

EPS

CMS:

$3.38

CPK:

$5.25

PE Ratio

CMS:

21.59

CPK:

25.17

PEG Ratio

CMS:

2.98

CPK:

2.53

PS Ratio

CMS:

2.83

CPK:

3.86

PB Ratio

CMS:

2.72

CPK:

2.18

Total Revenue (TTM)

CMS:

$7.79B

CPK:

$541.29M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CMS:

$3.05B

CPK:

$209.65M

EBITDA (TTM)

CMS:

$3.15B

CPK:

$199.05M

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CMS having a 10.25% return and CPK slightly lower at 10.05%. Over the past 10 years, CMS has underperformed CPK with an annualized return of 11.43%, while CPK has yielded a comparatively higher 12.67% annualized return.


CMS

YTD

10.25%

1M

0.30%

6M

8.41%

1Y

22.22%

5Y*

8.25%

10Y*

11.43%

CPK

YTD

10.05%

1M

1.79%

6M

14.23%

1Y

23.34%

5Y*

10.98%

10Y*

12.67%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CMS vs. CPK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CMS is 8787
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CMS is 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CMS is 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CMS is 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CMS is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CMS is 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

CPK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CPK is 8585
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CPK is 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CPK is 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CPK is 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CPK is 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CPK is 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CMS vs. CPK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) and Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for CMS, currently valued at 1.42, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
CMS: 1.42
CPK: 1.39
The chart of Sortino ratio for CMS, currently valued at 1.93, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
CMS: 1.93
CPK: 1.97
The chart of Omega ratio for CMS, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
CMS: 1.25
CPK: 1.24
The chart of Calmar ratio for CMS, currently valued at 1.69, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
CMS: 1.69
CPK: 1.11
The chart of Martin ratio for CMS, currently valued at 5.98, compared to the broader market-40.00-30.00-20.00-10.000.0010.0020.00
CMS: 5.98
CPK: 6.00

The current CMS Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the CPK Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMS and CPK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1.42
1.39
CMS
CPK

Dividends

CMS vs. CPK - Dividend Comparison

CMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, more than CPK's 1.93% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CMS
CMS Energy Corporation
2.86%3.09%3.36%2.91%2.67%2.67%2.43%2.88%2.81%2.98%3.22%3.11%
CPK
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation
1.93%2.07%2.18%1.76%1.29%1.59%1.65%1.77%1.63%1.80%2.00%2.15%

Drawdowns

CMS vs. CPK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMS drawdown since its inception was -91.20%, which is greater than CPK's maximum drawdown of -38.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMS and CPK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-3.44%
-2.92%
CMS
CPK

Volatility

CMS vs. CPK - Volatility Comparison

CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) and Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) have volatilities of 7.30% and 7.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
7.30%
7.36%
CMS
CPK

Financials

CMS vs. CPK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CMS Energy Corporation and Chesapeake Utilities Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20212022202320242025
2.45B
215.05M
(CMS) Total Revenue
(CPK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CMS vs. CPK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CMS Energy Corporation and Chesapeake Utilities Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%20212022202320242025
42.7%
42.6%
(CMS) Gross Margin
(CPK) Gross Margin
CMS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CMS Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.04B and revenue of 2.45B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.7%.
CPK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Chesapeake Utilities Corporation reported a gross profit of 91.65M and revenue of 215.05M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.6%.
CMS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CMS Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 494.00M and revenue of 2.45B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.2%.
CPK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Chesapeake Utilities Corporation reported an operating income of 66.91M and revenue of 215.05M, resulting in an operating margin of 31.1%.
CMS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CMS Energy Corporation reported a net income of 304.00M and revenue of 2.45B, resulting in a net margin of 12.4%.
CPK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Chesapeake Utilities Corporation reported a net income of 36.65M and revenue of 215.05M, resulting in a net margin of 17.0%.