CMS vs. EIX

In the year-to-date period, CMS achieves a 21.93% return, which is significantly lower than EIX's 24.31% return. Over the past 10 years, CMS has outperformed EIX with an annualized return of 10.95%, while EIX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.31% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) and Edison International (EIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CMS Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is lower than the EIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMS and EIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

CMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, less than EIX's 3.62% yield.

The maximum CMS drawdown since its inception was -91.20%, which is greater than EIX's maximum drawdown of -72.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMS and EIX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) has a higher volatility of 5.81% compared to Edison International (EIX) at 5.28%. This indicates that CMS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CMS Energy Corporation and Edison International. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.