CMS vs. ES
CMS (CMS Energy Corporation) and ES (Eversource Energy) are both stocks. Both operate in the Utilities - Regulated Electric industry within the Utilities sector. Over the past 10 years, CMS returned 8.46%/yr vs 5.67%/yr for ES. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CMS vs. ES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMS achieves a 7.15% return, which is significantly higher than ES's 6.49% return. Over the past 10 years, CMS has outperformed ES with an annualized return of 8.46%, while ES has yielded a comparatively lower 5.67% annualized return.
CMS
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -0.98%
- YTD
- 7.15%
- 6M
- 7.40%
- 1Y
- 10.14%
- 3Y*
- 11.48%
- 5Y*
- 8.16%
- 10Y*
- 8.46%
ES
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 6.49%
- 6M
- 8.57%
- 1Y
- 17.29%
- 3Y*
- 4.89%
- 5Y*
- 1.67%
- 10Y*
- 5.67%
CMS vs. ES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMS CMS Energy Corporation | 7.15% | 8.13% | 18.60% | -5.21% | 0.84% | 9.71% | -0.32% | 30.04% | 8.25% | 17.03% |
ES Eversource Energy | 6.49% | 22.86% | -2.46% | -23.43% | -5.06% | 8.18% | 4.45% | 34.49% | 6.41% | 17.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMS and ES is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1984 | 0.46 |
The correlation between CMS and ES shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (all time) to 0.77 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CMS:
$4.92
ES:
$4.68
CMS:
15.00
ES:
14.98
CMS:
1.88
ES:
1.88
CMS:
$8.82B
ES:
$13.93B
CMS:
$4.16B
ES:
$4.19B
CMS:
$3.09B
ES:
$4.60B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMS vs. ES — Risk / Return Rank
CMS
ES
CMS vs. ES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) and Eversource Energy (ES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CMS | ES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.16 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | 1.15 | -0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.25 | 2.74 | -0.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CMS vs. ES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMS drawdown since its inception was -91.20%, which is greater than ES's maximum drawdown of -73.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMS and ES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMS | ES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.20% | -73.04% | -18.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.48% | -15.13% | +3.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.61% | -28.65% | +9.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.56% | -41.69% | +14.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.55% | -41.69% | +12.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.96% | -11.51% | +4.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.33% | -19.06% | -8.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.51% | 6.32% | -1.81% |
Volatility
CMS vs. ES - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) is 6.46%, while Eversource Energy (ES) has a volatility of 6.97%. This indicates that CMS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMS | ES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.46% | 6.97% | -0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.45% | 16.06% | -3.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.22% | 24.63% | -8.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.93% | 23.89% | -4.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.72% | 24.37% | -3.65% |
Dividends
CMS vs. ES - Dividend Comparison
CMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, less than ES's 4.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMS CMS Energy Corporation | 3.01% | 3.10% | 3.09% | 3.36% | 3.62% | 2.67% | 2.67% | 2.43% | 2.88% | 2.81% | 2.98% | 3.22% |
ES Eversource Energy | 4.39% | 4.47% | 4.98% | 4.37% | 3.04% | 2.65% | 2.62% | 2.52% | 3.11% | 3.01% | 3.22% | 3.27% |
Financials
CMS vs. ES - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CMS Energy Corporation and Eversource Energy. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CMS and ES have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ES has higher volatility (6.97%) compared to CMS (6.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMS dropped -91.20% vs ES's -73.04%.
ES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.71 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CMS and ES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer