PortfoliosLab logo
CMS vs. ES
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CMS and ES is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

CMS vs. ES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) and Eversource Energy (ES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CMS:

0.92

ES:

0.33

Sortino Ratio

CMS:

1.39

ES:

0.61

Omega Ratio

CMS:

1.18

ES:

1.08

Calmar Ratio

CMS:

1.21

ES:

0.23

Martin Ratio

CMS:

4.13

ES:

0.92

Ulcer Index

CMS:

4.16%

ES:

8.67%

Daily Std Dev

CMS:

17.63%

ES:

24.52%

Max Drawdown

CMS:

-91.20%

ES:

-65.47%

Current Drawdown

CMS:

-5.40%

ES:

-24.73%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CMS:

$20.58B

ES:

$22.54B

EPS

CMS:

$3.38

ES:

$2.28

PE Ratio

CMS:

20.35

ES:

26.91

PEG Ratio

CMS:

2.80

ES:

0.92

PS Ratio

CMS:

2.64

ES:

1.78

PB Ratio

CMS:

2.55

ES:

1.47

Total Revenue (TTM)

CMS:

$7.79B

ES:

$12.69B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CMS:

$3.05B

ES:

$4.91B

EBITDA (TTM)

CMS:

$3.15B

ES:

$4.26B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMS achieves a 8.02% return, which is significantly lower than ES's 11.30% return. Over the past 10 years, CMS has outperformed ES with an annualized return of 10.92%, while ES has yielded a comparatively lower 5.97% annualized return.


CMS

YTD

8.02%

1M

-1.76%

6M

6.80%

1Y

16.06%

5Y*

9.00%

10Y*

10.92%

ES

YTD

11.30%

1M

8.92%

6M

5.25%

1Y

8.05%

5Y*

-0.26%

10Y*

5.97%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CMS vs. ES — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CMS is 8080
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CMS is 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CMS is 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CMS is 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CMS is 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CMS is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

ES
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ES is 5959
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ES is 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ES is 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ES is 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ES is 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ES is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CMS vs. ES - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) and Eversource Energy (ES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CMS Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is higher than the ES Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMS and ES, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CMS vs. ES - Dividend Comparison

CMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, less than ES's 4.71% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CMS
CMS Energy Corporation
2.98%3.09%3.36%2.91%2.67%2.67%2.43%2.88%2.81%2.98%3.22%3.11%
ES
Eversource Energy
4.71%4.98%4.37%3.04%2.65%2.62%2.52%3.11%3.01%3.22%3.27%2.93%

Drawdowns

CMS vs. ES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMS drawdown since its inception was -91.20%, which is greater than ES's maximum drawdown of -65.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMS and ES. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CMS vs. ES - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) is 6.79%, while Eversource Energy (ES) has a volatility of 8.00%. This indicates that CMS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CMS vs. ES - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CMS Energy Corporation and Eversource Energy. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B4.00B20212022202320242025
2.45B
4.12B
(CMS) Total Revenue
(ES) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CMS vs. ES - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CMS Energy Corporation and Eversource Energy over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
42.7%
55.6%
(CMS) Gross Margin
(ES) Gross Margin
CMS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CMS Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.04B and revenue of 2.45B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.7%.

ES - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Eversource Energy reported a gross profit of 2.29B and revenue of 4.12B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.6%.

CMS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CMS Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 494.00M and revenue of 2.45B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.2%.

ES - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Eversource Energy reported an operating income of 926.39M and revenue of 4.12B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.5%.

CMS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CMS Energy Corporation reported a net income of 304.00M and revenue of 2.45B, resulting in a net margin of 12.4%.

ES - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Eversource Energy reported a net income of 550.79M and revenue of 4.12B, resulting in a net margin of 13.4%.