PortfoliosLab logo
CMS vs. XEL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CMS and XEL is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

CMS vs. XEL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) and Xcel Energy Inc. (XEL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CMS:

0.95

XEL:

1.68

Sortino Ratio

CMS:

1.45

XEL:

2.31

Omega Ratio

CMS:

1.18

XEL:

1.31

Calmar Ratio

CMS:

1.27

XEL:

1.25

Martin Ratio

CMS:

4.35

XEL:

8.07

Ulcer Index

CMS:

4.17%

XEL:

4.33%

Daily Std Dev

CMS:

17.63%

XEL:

20.59%

Max Drawdown

CMS:

-91.20%

XEL:

-80.64%

Current Drawdown

CMS:

-4.64%

XEL:

0.00%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CMS:

$21.21B

XEL:

$41.10B

EPS

CMS:

$3.38

XEL:

$3.40

PE Ratio

CMS:

20.98

XEL:

20.96

PEG Ratio

CMS:

2.87

XEL:

2.81

PS Ratio

CMS:

2.72

XEL:

3.00

PB Ratio

CMS:

2.61

XEL:

2.08

Total Revenue (TTM)

CMS:

$7.79B

XEL:

$13.71B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CMS:

$3.05B

XEL:

$4.66B

EBITDA (TTM)

CMS:

$3.15B

XEL:

$5.59B

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CMS having a 8.89% return and XEL slightly higher at 8.99%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CMS having a 10.95% annualized return and XEL not far ahead at 11.19%.


CMS

YTD

8.89%

1M

-0.22%

6M

6.36%

1Y

16.70%

5Y*

9.17%

10Y*

10.95%

XEL

YTD

8.99%

1M

4.75%

6M

5.95%

1Y

34.26%

5Y*

7.87%

10Y*

11.19%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CMS vs. XEL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CMS is 8181
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CMS is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CMS is 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CMS is 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CMS is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CMS is 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

XEL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XEL is 9090
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XEL is 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XEL is 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XEL is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XEL is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XEL is 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CMS vs. XEL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) and Xcel Energy Inc. (XEL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CMS Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the XEL Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMS and XEL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CMS vs. XEL - Dividend Comparison

CMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, less than XEL's 3.06% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CMS
CMS Energy Corporation
2.96%3.09%3.36%2.91%2.67%2.67%2.43%2.88%2.81%2.98%3.22%3.11%
XEL
Xcel Energy Inc.
3.06%2.43%3.36%2.78%2.70%2.58%2.55%3.09%2.99%3.34%3.56%3.34%

Drawdowns

CMS vs. XEL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMS drawdown since its inception was -91.20%, which is greater than XEL's maximum drawdown of -80.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMS and XEL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CMS vs. XEL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) is 6.80%, while Xcel Energy Inc. (XEL) has a volatility of 8.08%. This indicates that CMS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CMS vs. XEL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CMS Energy Corporation and Xcel Energy Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B4.00B20212022202320242025
2.45B
3.91B
(CMS) Total Revenue
(XEL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CMS vs. XEL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CMS Energy Corporation and Xcel Energy Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20212022202320242025
42.7%
43.1%
(CMS) Gross Margin
(XEL) Gross Margin
CMS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CMS Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.04B and revenue of 2.45B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.7%.

XEL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Xcel Energy Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.69B and revenue of 3.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.1%.

CMS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CMS Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 494.00M and revenue of 2.45B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.2%.

XEL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Xcel Energy Inc. reported an operating income of 677.00M and revenue of 3.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.3%.

CMS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CMS Energy Corporation reported a net income of 304.00M and revenue of 2.45B, resulting in a net margin of 12.4%.

XEL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Xcel Energy Inc. reported a net income of 483.00M and revenue of 3.91B, resulting in a net margin of 12.4%.