PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NKE vs. DECK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NKE vs. DECK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NIKE, Inc. (NKE) and Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NKE achieves a -31.15% return, which is significantly lower than DECK's 1.83% return. Over the past 10 years, NKE has underperformed DECK with an annualized return of -0.59%, while DECK has yielded a comparatively higher 27.48% annualized return.


NKE

1D
-4.45%
1M
-2.45%
YTD
-31.15%
6M
-23.34%
1Y
-25.78%
3Y*
-25.12%
5Y*
-18.82%
10Y*
-0.59%

DECK

1D
-3.24%
1M
-1.03%
YTD
1.83%
6M
3.59%
1Y
3.82%
3Y*
7.77%
5Y*
12.46%
10Y*
27.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NKE vs. DECK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NKE
NIKE, Inc.
-31.15%-13.83%-29.11%-6.01%-29.04%18.70%40.97%38.09%19.87%24.70%
DECK
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
1.83%-48.95%82.30%67.46%8.97%27.73%69.83%31.97%59.44%44.88%

Correlation

The correlation between NKE and DECK is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 1993

0.29

Over the past year, NKE and DECK have become more correlated (0.50) than their long-term average of 0.29, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NKE:

$63.94B

DECK:

$14.94B

EPS

NKE:

$1.52

DECK:

$6.98

PE Ratio

NKE:

28.41

DECK:

15.13

PS Ratio

NKE:

1.37

DECK:

2.83

PB Ratio

NKE:

4.54

DECK:

5.98

Total Revenue (TTM)

NKE:

$46.52B

DECK:

$5.47B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NKE:

$18.99B

DECK:

$3.16B

EBITDA (TTM)

NKE:

$3.33B

DECK:

$1.31B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NKE vs. DECK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NKE
NKE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
NKE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NKE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
NKE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
NKE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
NKE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

DECK
DECK Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
DECK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DECK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
DECK Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
DECK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
DECK Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NKE vs. DECK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NIKE, Inc. (NKE) and Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NKEDECKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.06

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.56

0.11

-0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.03

0.23

-1.26

NKE vs. DECK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NKE Sharpe Ratio is -0.67, which is lower than the DECK Sharpe Ratio of 0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NKE and DECK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NKE vs. DECK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NKE drawdown since its inception was -75.19%, smaller than the maximum DECK drawdown of -94.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NKE and DECK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NKEDECKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.19%

-94.36%

+19.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.18%

-35.81%

-10.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.21%

-64.35%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.64%

-64.35%

-10.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.64%

-64.35%

-10.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-73.61%

-52.68%

-20.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.95%

-40.36%

+19.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.09%

16.91%

+8.18%

Volatility

NKE vs. DECK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NIKE, Inc. (NKE) is 11.01%, while Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) has a volatility of 12.08%. This indicates that NKE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DECK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NKEDECKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.01%

12.08%

-1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.66%

31.62%

-1.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.57%

45.53%

-6.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.99%

44.05%

-8.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.35%

42.53%

-10.18%

Dividends

NKE vs. DECK - Dividend Comparison

NKE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, while DECK has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DECK
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NKE
NIKE, Inc.
3.77%2.53%2.00%1.28%1.07%0.68%0.71%0.89%1.11%1.18%1.30%0.93%

Financials

NKE vs. DECK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NIKE, Inc. and Deckers Outdoor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
11.28B
1.12B
(NKE) Total Revenue
(DECK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NKE vs. DECK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between NIKE, Inc. and Deckers Outdoor Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
40.2%
57.6%
Portfolio components
NKE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NIKE, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.53B and revenue of 11.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.2%.

DECK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deckers Outdoor Corporation reported a gross profit of 644.64M and revenue of 1.12B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.6%.

NKE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NIKE, Inc. reported an operating income of 553.00M and revenue of 11.28B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.

DECK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deckers Outdoor Corporation reported an operating income of 156.73M and revenue of 1.12B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.

NKE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NIKE, Inc. reported a net income of 520.00M and revenue of 11.28B, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.

DECK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deckers Outdoor Corporation reported a net income of 135.57M and revenue of 1.12B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NKE and DECK have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DECK has higher volatility (12.08%) compared to NKE (11.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NKE dropped -75.19% vs DECK's -94.36%.

DECK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.08 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NKE and DECK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer