CMCX.L vs. ET
CMCX.L (CMC Markets plc) and ET (Energy Transfer LP) are both stocks. CMCX.L operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services), while ET operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past 10 years, CMCX.L returned 9.59%/yr vs 13.56%/yr for ET. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CMCX.L vs. ET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CMCX.L is traded in GBp, while ET is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ET values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMCX.L achieves a 53.85% return, which is significantly higher than ET's 19.37% return. Over the past 10 years, CMCX.L has underperformed ET with an annualized return of 9.59%, while ET has yielded a comparatively higher 13.56% annualized return.
CMCX.L
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 21.37%
- YTD
- 53.85%
- 6M
- 63.41%
- 1Y
- 91.39%
- 3Y*
- 45.92%
- 5Y*
- 5.39%
- 10Y*
- 9.59%
ET
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- -6.79%
- YTD
- 19.37%
- 6M
- 18.44%
- 1Y
- 12.51%
- 3Y*
- 21.39%
- 5Y*
- 20.85%
- 10Y*
- 13.56%
CMCX.L vs. ET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMCX.L CMC Markets plc | 53.85% | 27.16% | 144.09% | -51.43% | -10.97% | -28.25% | 183.92% | 43.23% | -26.78% | 45.42% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 19.37% | -15.82% | 56.56% | 21.48% | 74.26% | 44.32% | -46.54% | 1.85% | -12.87% | -12.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMCX.L and ET is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2016 | 0.04 |
The correlation between CMCX.L and ET shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.05 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CMCX.L:
£1.29B
ET:
$65.38B
CMCX.L:
£0.50
ET:
$1.36
CMCX.L:
9.27
ET:
13.89
CMCX.L:
1.68
ET:
0.75
CMCX.L:
2.82
ET:
1.31
CMCX.L:
£755.33M
ET:
$89.38B
CMCX.L:
£533.42M
ET:
$20.48B
CMCX.L:
£232.99M
ET:
$13.02B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMCX.L vs. ET — Risk / Return Rank
CMCX.L
ET
CMCX.L vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CMC Markets plc (CMCX.L) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CMCX.L | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.13 | +0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.34 | 1.39 | +3.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.73 | 3.02 | +10.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CMCX.L vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMCX.L drawdown since its inception was -81.04%, smaller than the maximum ET drawdown of -86.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMCX.L and ET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMCX.L | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.04% | -86.84% | +5.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.02% | -9.03% | -7.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.29% | -29.54% | -15.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.60% | -29.54% | -49.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.04% | -71.58% | -9.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.08% | -7.73% | +6.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.50% | -21.54% | -18.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.63% | 4.23% | +2.40% |
Volatility
CMCX.L vs. ET - Volatility Comparison
CMC Markets plc (CMCX.L) has a higher volatility of 17.70% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 5.04%. This indicates that CMCX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMCX.L | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.70% | 5.04% | +12.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.28% | 13.34% | +10.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.98% | 17.65% | +24.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.80% | 24.57% | +22.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.36% | 34.84% | +11.52% |
Dividends
CMCX.L vs. ET - Dividend Comparison
CMCX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, less than ET's 7.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMCX.L CMC Markets plc | 3.00% | 4.62% | 4.19% | 4.67% | 5.53% | 9.46% | 5.47% | 2.41% | 6.94% | 5.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 7.06% | 7.97% | 6.51% | 8.95% | 7.33% | 7.41% | 17.27% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% |
Financials
CMCX.L vs. ET - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CMC Markets plc and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CMCX.L vs. ET - Profitability Comparison
CMCX.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CMC Markets plc reported a gross profit of 188.08M and revenue of 217.26M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.6%.
ET - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 6.62B and revenue of 27.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.9%.
CMCX.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CMC Markets plc reported an operating income of 57.64M and revenue of 217.26M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.5%.
ET - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.98B and revenue of 27.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.7%.
CMCX.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CMC Markets plc reported a net income of 38.42M and revenue of 217.26M, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.
ET - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.25B and revenue of 27.77B, resulting in a net margin of 4.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CMCX.L and ET have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CMCX.L and ET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer