CLSK vs. FNGS
CLSK (CleanSpark, Inc.) is a stock, while FNGS (MicroSectors FANG+ ETN) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index. Over the past 5 years, CLSK returned -2.03%/yr vs 19.76%/yr for FNGS. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CLSK vs. FNGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLSK achieves a 62.85% return, which is significantly higher than FNGS's 6.79% return.
CLSK
- 1D
- 1.92%
- 1M
- 25.71%
- YTD
- 62.85%
- 6M
- 17.46%
- 1Y
- 77.20%
- 3Y*
- 61.95%
- 5Y*
- -2.03%
- 10Y*
- -6.12%
FNGS
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- -1.94%
- YTD
- 6.79%
- 6M
- 4.25%
- 1Y
- 19.09%
- 3Y*
- 29.80%
- 5Y*
- 19.76%
- 10Y*
- —
CLSK vs. FNGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLSK CleanSpark, Inc. | 62.85% | 9.88% | -16.50% | 440.69% | -78.57% | -67.23% | 442.99% | -43.98% |
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN | 6.79% | 18.64% | 51.99% | 95.24% | -40.32% | 16.96% | 101.99% | 10.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLSK and FNGS is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2019 | 0.42 |
The correlation between CLSK and FNGS shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLSK vs. FNGS — Risk / Return Rank
CLSK
FNGS
CLSK vs. FNGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLSK | FNGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.15 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.08 | 0.75 | +0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.80 | 2.12 | -0.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLSK vs. FNGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLSK drawdown since its inception was -98.56%, which is greater than FNGS's maximum drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSK and FNGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLSK | FNGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.56% | -48.98% | -49.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -64.74% | -22.93% | -41.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -71.28% | -26.77% | -44.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.00% | -48.98% | -43.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -98.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.42% | -9.63% | -67.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.75% | -10.85% | -58.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.95% | 8.05% | +30.90% |
Volatility
CLSK vs. FNGS - Volatility Comparison
CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) has a higher volatility of 23.60% compared to MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) at 8.74%. This indicates that CLSK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLSK | FNGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.60% | 8.74% | +14.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 62.76% | 17.19% | +45.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 88.85% | 21.65% | +67.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 100.81% | 30.10% | +70.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 183.25% | 31.17% | +152.08% |
Dividends
CLSK vs. FNGS - Dividend Comparison
Neither CLSK nor FNGS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CLSK and FNGS have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLSK has higher volatility (23.60%) compared to FNGS (8.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLSK dropped -98.56% vs FNGS's -48.98%.
FNGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CLSK and FNGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer