PortfoliosLab logo
CLSK vs. MARA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CLSK and MARA is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

CLSK vs. MARA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) and Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-72.86%
-54.34%
CLSK
MARA

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CLSK:

-0.48

MARA:

-0.23

Sortino Ratio

CLSK:

-0.27

MARA:

0.33

Omega Ratio

CLSK:

0.97

MARA:

1.04

Calmar Ratio

CLSK:

-0.53

MARA:

-0.25

Martin Ratio

CLSK:

-1.13

MARA:

-0.66

Ulcer Index

CLSK:

42.82%

MARA:

34.91%

Daily Std Dev

CLSK:

101.14%

MARA:

98.05%

Max Drawdown

CLSK:

-98.56%

MARA:

-99.74%

Current Drawdown

CLSK:

-88.85%

MARA:

-91.50%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CLSK:

$2.27B

MARA:

$5.10B

EPS

CLSK:

$0.00

MARA:

$1.72

PE Ratio

CLSK:

0.00

MARA:

8.42

PEG Ratio

CLSK:

0.00

MARA:

0.00

PS Ratio

CLSK:

5.29

MARA:

7.04

PB Ratio

CLSK:

1.22

MARA:

1.19

Total Revenue (TTM)

CLSK:

$355.69M

MARA:

$491.18M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CLSK:

$120.25M

MARA:

-$156.37M

EBITDA (TTM)

CLSK:

$109.68M

MARA:

$598.68M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLSK achieves a -12.16% return, which is significantly higher than MARA's -21.59% return.


CLSK

YTD

-12.16%

1M

10.52%

6M

-23.39%

1Y

-53.59%

5Y*

31.68%

10Y*

N/A

MARA

YTD

-21.59%

1M

16.37%

6M

-19.03%

1Y

-36.38%

5Y*

81.80%

10Y*

-17.78%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CLSK vs. MARA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLSK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CLSK is 2525
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CLSK is 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CLSK is 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CLSK is 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CLSK is 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CLSK is 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

MARA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MARA is 4040
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MARA is 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MARA is 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MARA is 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MARA is 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MARA is 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CLSK vs. MARA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) and Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CLSK Sharpe Ratio is -0.48, which is lower than the MARA Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLSK and MARA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.49
-0.23
CLSK
MARA

Dividends

CLSK vs. MARA - Dividend Comparison

Neither CLSK nor MARA has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2024202320222021
CLSK
CleanSpark, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.26%
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CLSK vs. MARA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLSK drawdown since its inception was -98.56%, roughly equal to the maximum MARA drawdown of -99.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSK and MARA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-90.00%-85.00%-80.00%-75.00%-70.00%-65.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-88.85%
-82.72%
CLSK
MARA

Volatility

CLSK vs. MARA - Volatility Comparison

CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) and Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA) have volatilities of 28.90% and 28.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
28.90%
28.11%
CLSK
MARA

Financials

CLSK vs. MARA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CleanSpark, Inc. and Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00MAprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
162.31M
214.39M
(CLSK) Total Revenue
(MARA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items