PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CLSK vs. MARA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CLSKMARA
YTD Return27.20%-10.30%
1Y Return265.36%115.88%
3Y Return (Ann)-8.66%-27.60%
5Y Return (Ann)12.48%79.37%
Sharpe Ratio1.950.96
Sortino Ratio2.871.99
Omega Ratio1.321.23
Calmar Ratio2.511.13
Martin Ratio6.572.87
Ulcer Index36.25%36.80%
Daily Std Dev122.38%109.98%
Max Drawdown-98.56%-99.74%
Current Drawdown-80.66%-86.38%

Fundamentals


CLSKMARA
Market Cap$4.55B$7.43B
EPS-$0.99$0.90
PEG Ratio0.000.00
Total Revenue (TTM)$289.69M$467.11M
Gross Profit (TTM)$74.44M-$31.83M
EBITDA (TTM)$136.86M-$215.57M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between CLSK and MARA is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CLSK vs. MARA - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CLSK achieves a 27.20% return, which is significantly higher than MARA's -10.30% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-52.93%
-26.84%
CLSK
MARA

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CLSK vs. MARA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) and Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLSK
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CLSK, currently valued at 1.95, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.95
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CLSK, currently valued at 2.87, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.87
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CLSK, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.32
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CLSK, currently valued at 2.51, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.51
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CLSK, currently valued at 6.57, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.006.57
MARA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MARA, currently valued at 0.96, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.000.96
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MARA, currently valued at 1.99, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.99
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MARA, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.23
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MARA, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.21
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MARA, currently valued at 2.87, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.002.87

CLSK vs. MARA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLSK Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is higher than the MARA Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLSK and MARA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.95
0.96
CLSK
MARA

Dividends

CLSK vs. MARA - Dividend Comparison

Neither CLSK nor MARA has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202320222021
CLSK
CleanSpark, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%1.26%
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CLSK vs. MARA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLSK drawdown since its inception was -98.56%, roughly equal to the maximum MARA drawdown of -99.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSK and MARA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-90.00%-85.00%-80.00%-75.00%-70.00%-65.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-80.66%
-72.31%
CLSK
MARA

Volatility

CLSK vs. MARA - Volatility Comparison

CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) has a higher volatility of 45.14% compared to Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA) at 40.53%. This indicates that CLSK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MARA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
45.14%
40.53%
CLSK
MARA

Financials

CLSK vs. MARA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CleanSpark, Inc. and Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items