FNGS vs. MAGS

In the year-to-date period, FNGS achieves a 2.39% return, which is significantly higher than MAGS's -4.17% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FNGS has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGS's 0.29% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FNGS Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is comparable to the MAGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGS and MAGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FNGS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MAGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%.

The maximum FNGS drawdown since its inception was -48.98%, which is greater than MAGS's maximum drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGS and MAGS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) have volatilities of 10.48% and 10.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.