PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CLSK vs. CIFR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CLSKCIFR
YTD Return27.20%60.53%
1Y Return265.36%165.20%
3Y Return (Ann)-8.66%-7.16%
Sharpe Ratio1.951.08
Sortino Ratio2.872.20
Omega Ratio1.321.24
Calmar Ratio2.511.55
Martin Ratio6.574.15
Ulcer Index36.25%31.35%
Daily Std Dev122.38%120.54%
Max Drawdown-98.56%-97.16%
Current Drawdown-80.66%-54.34%

Fundamentals


CLSKCIFR
Market Cap$4.55B$2.56B
EPS-$0.99-$0.15
Total Revenue (TTM)$289.69M$152.47M
Gross Profit (TTM)$74.44M$11.39M
EBITDA (TTM)$136.86M-$38.31M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between CLSK and CIFR is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

CLSK vs. CIFR - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CLSK achieves a 27.20% return, which is significantly lower than CIFR's 60.53% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-50.00%0.00%50.00%100.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-12.47%
72.21%
CLSK
CIFR

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CLSK vs. CIFR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) and Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLSK
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CLSK, currently valued at 1.95, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.95
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CLSK, currently valued at 2.87, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.87
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CLSK, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.32
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CLSK, currently valued at 2.88, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.88
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CLSK, currently valued at 6.57, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.006.57
CIFR
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CIFR, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.08
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CIFR, currently valued at 2.20, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.20
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CIFR, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.24
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CIFR, currently valued at 1.55, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.55
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CIFR, currently valued at 4.15, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.004.15

CLSK vs. CIFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLSK Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is higher than the CIFR Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLSK and CIFR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.95
1.08
CLSK
CIFR

Dividends

CLSK vs. CIFR - Dividend Comparison

Neither CLSK nor CIFR has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202320222021
CLSK
CleanSpark, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%1.26%
CIFR
Cipher Mining Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CLSK vs. CIFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLSK drawdown since its inception was -98.56%, roughly equal to the maximum CIFR drawdown of -97.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSK and CIFR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-40.04%
-54.34%
CLSK
CIFR

Volatility

CLSK vs. CIFR - Volatility Comparison

CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) has a higher volatility of 45.14% compared to Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) at 35.48%. This indicates that CLSK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%40.00%45.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
45.14%
35.48%
CLSK
CIFR

Financials

CLSK vs. CIFR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CleanSpark, Inc. and Cipher Mining Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items