PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLSK vs. MSTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CLSK vs. MSTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) and Strategy Inc (MSTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLSK achieves a 73.72% return, which is significantly higher than MSTR's -10.44% return. Over the past 10 years, CLSK has underperformed MSTR with an annualized return of -5.51%, while MSTR has yielded a comparatively higher 21.84% annualized return.


CLSK

1D
-6.54%
1M
44.45%
YTD
73.72%
6M
28.23%
1Y
104.18%
3Y*
61.80%
5Y*
1.21%
10Y*
-5.51%

MSTR

1D
-9.15%
1M
-23.19%
YTD
-10.44%
6M
-24.95%
1Y
-63.45%
3Y*
65.15%
5Y*
22.73%
10Y*
21.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLSK vs. MSTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CLSK
CleanSpark, Inc.
73.72%9.88%-16.50%440.69%-78.57%-67.23%442.99%-73.90%-15.98%-30.29%
MSTR
Strategy Inc
-10.44%-47.53%358.54%346.15%-74.00%40.13%172.42%11.65%-2.70%-33.49%

Correlation

The correlation between CLSK and MSTR is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2016

0.48

The correlation between CLSK and MSTR shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (all time) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

CLSK:

-$2.24

MSTR:

-$40.19

PS Ratio

CLSK:

5.31

MSTR:

85.31

Total Revenue (TTM)

CLSK:

$739.88M

MSTR:

$490.47M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CLSK:

$306.93M

MSTR:

$334.08M

EBITDA (TTM)

CLSK:

-$103.41M

MSTR:

$466.93M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLSK vs. MSTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLSK
CLSK Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
CLSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLSK Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
CLSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLSK Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTR
MSTR Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
MSTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTR Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTR Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLSK vs. MSTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) and Strategy Inc (MSTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLSKMSTRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.19

-0.91

+2.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.96

-1.55

+3.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

0.83

+0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

-0.82

+2.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.69

-1.23

+3.91

CLSK vs. MSTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLSK Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is higher than the MSTR Sharpe Ratio of -0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLSK and MSTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLSKMSTRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

-0.91

+2.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

0.25

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.03

0.30

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.03

0.13

-0.15

Drawdowns

CLSK vs. MSTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLSK drawdown since its inception was -98.56%, roughly equal to the maximum MSTR drawdown of -99.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSK and MSTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLSKMSTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.56%

-99.86%

+1.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-64.74%

-76.53%

+11.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.28%

-77.42%

+6.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.00%

-84.11%

-7.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.56%

-89.27%

-9.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-75.92%

-71.28%

-4.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.48%

-86.48%

+17.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.60%

51.39%

-12.79%

Volatility

CLSK vs. MSTR - Volatility Comparison

CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) has a higher volatility of 20.72% compared to Strategy Inc (MSTR) at 19.27%. This indicates that CLSK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLSKMSTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.72%

19.27%

+1.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

62.70%

56.14%

+6.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

88.40%

69.99%

+18.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

100.72%

90.74%

+9.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

183.26%

73.68%

+109.58%

Dividends

CLSK vs. MSTR - Dividend Comparison

Neither CLSK nor MSTR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CLSK vs. MSTR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CleanSpark, Inc. and Strategy Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M20222023202420252026
136.41M
124.30M
(CLSK) Total Revenue
(MSTR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CLSK and MSTR have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CLSK has higher volatility (20.72%) compared to MSTR (19.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLSK dropped -98.56% vs MSTR's -99.86%.

CLSK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLSK and MSTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer