PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
CLSK vs. BTC-USD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

CLSK vs. BTC-USD

Last updated Feb 22, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) and Bitcoin (BTC-USD).

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CLSK or BTC-USD.

Correlation

The correlation between CLSK and BTC-USD is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

CLSK vs. BTC-USD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) and Bitcoin (BTC-USD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.
-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-26.64%
49.98%
CLSK
BTC-USD

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CLSK:

-0.44

BTC-USD:

1.48

Sortino Ratio

CLSK:

-0.13

BTC-USD:

2.19

Omega Ratio

CLSK:

0.99

BTC-USD:

1.22

Calmar Ratio

CLSK:

-0.54

BTC-USD:

1.23

Martin Ratio

CLSK:

-1.13

BTC-USD:

8.41

Ulcer Index

CLSK:

42.66%

BTC-USD:

8.60%

Daily Std Dev

CLSK:

108.51%

BTC-USD:

43.82%

Max Drawdown

CLSK:

-98.56%

BTC-USD:

-93.07%

Current Drawdown

CLSK:

-87.25%

BTC-USD:

-9.44%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLSK achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly lower than BTC-USD's 2.89% return.

CLSK

YTD

0.43%

1M

-16.97%

6M

-26.65%

1Y

-45.87%

5Y*

23.89%

10Y*

N/A

BTC-USD

YTD

2.89%

1M

-7.26%

6M

49.98%

1Y

87.36%

5Y*

57.48%

10Y*

82.18%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CLSK vs. BTC-USD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CLSK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CLSK is 2323
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CLSK is 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CLSK is 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CLSK is 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CLSK is 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CLSK is 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
BTC-USD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BTC-USD is 8686
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BTC-USD is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BTC-USD is 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BTC-USD is 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BTC-USD is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BTC-USD is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CLSK vs. BTC-USD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) and Bitcoin (BTC-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CLSK, currently valued at -0.60, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.00-0.601.48
The chart of Sortino ratio for CLSK, currently valued at -0.66, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.662.19
The chart of Omega ratio for CLSK, currently valued at 0.93, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.931.22
The chart of Calmar ratio for CLSK, currently valued at -0.54, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.541.23
The chart of Martin ratio for CLSK, currently valued at -1.52, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-1.528.41
CLSK
BTC-USD

The current CLSK Sharpe Ratio is -0.44, which is lower than the BTC-USD Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLSK and BTC-USD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.60
1.48
CLSK
BTC-USD

Drawdowns

CLSK vs. BTC-USD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLSK drawdown since its inception was -98.56%, which is greater than BTC-USD's maximum drawdown of -93.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSK and BTC-USD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-87.25%
-9.44%
CLSK
BTC-USD

Volatility

CLSK vs. BTC-USD - Volatility Comparison

CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) has a higher volatility of 22.44% compared to Bitcoin (BTC-USD) at 9.00%. This indicates that CLSK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTC-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
22.44%
9.00%
CLSK
BTC-USD
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Risk Analysis
DrawdownsExpected ShortfallUlcer IndexValue at RiskClose-to-Close VolatilityParkinson VolatilityGarman Klass VolatilityRogers-Satchell VolatilityYang Zhang Volatility
Optimization
Asset CorrelationsPortfolio OptimizationRisk Parity OptimizationHierarchical Risk Parity (HRP) Optimization
Factor Model
AlphaBeta
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Screeners
ETF ScreenerFund ScreenerStock Screener
Community
Discussions

Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio

DrawdownsExpected ShortfallUlcer IndexValue at RiskClose-to-Close VolatilityParkinson VolatilityGarman Klass VolatilityRogers-Satchell VolatilityYang Zhang Volatility

Asset CorrelationsPortfolio OptimizationRisk Parity OptimizationHierarchical Risk Parity (HRP) Optimization

AlphaBeta

Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios

ETF ScreenerFund ScreenerStock Screener

Discussions
Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceAboutAffiliate Program

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab