FNGS vs. MON100.NS
Compare and contrast key facts about MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) and Motilal Oswal NASDAQ 100 ETF (MON100.NS).
FNGS and MON100.NS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FNGS is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG+ Index. It was launched on Nov 12, 2019. MON100.NS is a passively managed fund by Motilal Oswal that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Mar 29, 2011. Both FNGS and MON100.NS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FNGS vs. MON100.NS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FNGS vs. MON100.NS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN | -12.40% | 18.64% | 51.99% | 95.24% | -40.32% | 16.96% | 101.99% | 10.91% |
MON100.NS Motilal Oswal NASDAQ 100 ETF | -0.40% | 8.64% | 56.36% | 53.45% | -26.09% | 30.21% | 50.75% | 6.18% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNGS achieves a -12.40% return, which is significantly lower than MON100.NS's -0.40% return.
FNGS
- 1D
- 4.69%
- 1M
- -4.21%
- YTD
- -12.40%
- 6M
- -14.82%
- 1Y
- 19.65%
- 3Y*
- 30.42%
- 5Y*
- 15.68%
- 10Y*
- —
MON100.NS
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 3.14%
- YTD
- -0.40%
- 6M
- 4.02%
- 1Y
- 27.51%
- 3Y*
- 30.37%
- 5Y*
- 19.98%
- 10Y*
- 22.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FNGS vs. MON100.NS - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FNGS and MON100.NS have an expense ratio of 0.58%.
Return for Risk
FNGS vs. MON100.NS — Risk / Return Rank
FNGS
MON100.NS
FNGS vs. MON100.NS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) and Motilal Oswal NASDAQ 100 ETF (MON100.NS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FNGS | MON100.NS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.73 | 1.39 | -0.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.26 | 2.07 | -0.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.27 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.84 | 1.64 | -0.80 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.59 | 3.57 | -0.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FNGS | MON100.NS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 | 1.39 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 1.01 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.93 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between FNGS and MON100.NS is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FNGS vs. MON100.NS - Dividend Comparison
Neither FNGS nor MON100.NS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
FNGS vs. MON100.NS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNGS drawdown since its inception was -48.98%, which is greater than MON100.NS's maximum drawdown of -36.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGS and MON100.NS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNGS | MON100.NS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.98% | -36.27% | -12.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.93% | -13.06% | -9.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.98% | -28.34% | -20.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.32% | -7.38% | -11.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.02% | -7.33% | -3.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.43% | 6.40% | +1.03% |
Volatility
FNGS vs. MON100.NS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) is 8.31%, while Motilal Oswal NASDAQ 100 ETF (MON100.NS) has a volatility of 8.90%. This indicates that FNGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MON100.NS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FNGS | MON100.NS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.31% | 8.90% | -0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.68% | 16.05% | -0.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.98% | 20.43% | +6.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.97% | 20.22% | +9.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.34% | 23.05% | +8.29% |