FNGS vs. FNGO

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FNGS (MicroSectors FANG+ ETN) and FNGO (MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - FNGS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index, while FNGO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index (+200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FNGS returned 18.98%/yr vs 23.80%/yr for FNGO. Their 0.99 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. FNGS charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FNGO.

Performance

FNGS vs. FNGO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) and MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGS achieves a 9.02% return, which is significantly lower than FNGO's 12.30% return.

FNGS

• 1D: 1.63%
• 1M: 0.59%
• 6M: 12.42%
• YTD: 9.02%
• 1Y: 15.45%
• 3Y*: 28.64%
• 5Y*: 18.98%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 30.45%

FNGO

• 1D: 3.64%
• 1M: 1.33%
• 6M: 20.30%
• YTD: 12.30%
• 1Y: 21.80%
• 3Y*: 47.42%
• 5Y*: 23.80%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 37.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FNGO MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN	$408.43K	$444.96K	$770.86K
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN	$1.57M	$1.92M	$2.40M

FNGS vs. FNGO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN	9.02%	18.64%	51.99%	95.24%	-40.32%	16.96%	101.99%	10.10%
FNGO MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN	12.30%	25.49%	101.65%	240.10%	-71.55%	28.38%	238.00%	19.70%

Correlation

The correlation between FNGS and FNGO is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2019	0.99

The correlation between FNGS and FNGO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNGS vs. FNGO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FNGS	FNGO
Technology	59.6%	59.6%
Communication Services	30.0%	30.0%
Consumer Cyclical	10.4%	10.4%
Financial Services	10.0%	10.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FNGS vs. FNGO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FNGS

FNGS Risk / Return Rank: 22
FNGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
FNGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
FNGS Omega Ratio Rank: 23
FNGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
FNGS Martin Ratio Rank: 21

FNGO

FNGO Risk / Return Rank: 19
FNGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
FNGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
FNGO Omega Ratio Rank: 21
FNGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
FNGO Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FNGS vs. FNGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) and MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FNGS	FNGO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.52	0.36	+0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.86	0.80	+0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.09	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.51	0.38	+0.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.37	0.92	+0.45

FNGS vs. FNGO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNGS Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is higher than the FNGO Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGS and FNGO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FNGS vs. FNGO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGS drawdown since its inception was -48.98%, smaller than the maximum FNGO drawdown of -78.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGS and FNGO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNGS	FNGO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.98%	-78.39%	+29.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.93%	-42.73%	+19.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.77%	-47.64%	+20.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.98%	-78.39%	+29.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.74%	-15.91%	+8.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.80%	-23.75%	+12.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.61%	17.55%	-8.94%

Volatility

FNGS vs. FNGO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) is 5.87%, while MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) has a volatility of 12.24%. This indicates that FNGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNGS	FNGO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.87%	12.24%	-6.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.36%	36.19%	-17.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.86%	44.77%	-21.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.29%	60.86%	-30.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.07%	61.47%	-30.40%

FNGS vs. FNGO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNGS has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGO's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNGS vs. FNGO - Dividend Comparison

Neither FNGS nor FNGO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNGS and FNGO in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, FNGS and FNGO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FNGS or FNGO?

FNGO has higher volatility (12.24%) compared to FNGS (5.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNGS dropped -48.98% vs FNGO's -78.39%.

Which ETF is better, FNGS or FNGO?

On 5-year performance, FNGO leads with 23.80% vs 18.98% for FNGS. On fees, FNGS is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, FNGS has been the lower-risk option at 5.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FNGS or FNGO?

Over the 5-year period, FNGO has performed better with a 23.80% return vs 18.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNGS or FNGO?

FNGS is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FNGO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FNGS or FNGO?

FNGS and FNGO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between FNGS and FNGO?

FNGS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FNGO is Leveraged Equities. FNGS tracks NYSE FANG+ Index, while FNGO tracks NYSE FANG+ Index (+200%). Their fees differ too: 0.58% for FNGS and 0.95% for FNGO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.52 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.