PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CLS vs. HDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

CLS vs. HDV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CLS (Celestica Inc.) is a stock, while HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) is Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. Over the past 10 years, CLS returned 43.13%/yr vs 9.45%/yr for HDV. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CLS vs. HDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Celestica Inc. (CLS) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLS achieves a 18.81% return, which is significantly higher than HDV's 14.07% return. Over the past 10 years, CLS has outperformed HDV with an annualized return of 43.13%, while HDV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.45% annualized return.

CLS

1D
-6.80%
1M
-4.40%
YTD
18.81%
6M
15.73%
1Y
157.59%
3Y*
191.08%
5Y*
113.59%
10Y*
43.13%

HDV

1D
1.33%
1M
-1.35%
YTD
14.07%
6M
14.08%
1Y
21.06%
3Y*
15.48%
5Y*
11.09%
10Y*
9.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLS vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CLS
Celestica Inc.		18.81%220.27%215.23%159.80%1.26%37.92%-2.42%-5.70%-16.32%-11.56%
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF		14.07%11.90%14.16%1.72%7.05%19.45%-6.48%20.22%-3.01%13.40%

Correlation

The correlation between CLS and HDV is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2011

0.34

The correlation between CLS and HDV shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Celestica Inc.

iShares Core High Dividend ETF

Often compared with CLS:
CLS vs. VRTCLS vs. CLS.TOCLS vs. FNCLS vs. FIXCLS vs. NBISCLS vs. MODCLS vs. SPY
Often compared with HDV:
HDV vs. SCHDHDV vs. VYMHDV vs. SPYDHDV vs. DGROHDV vs. DVYHDV vs. VIGHDV vs. SPY

Return for Risk

CLS vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CLS
CLS Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
CLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLS Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
CLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLS Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
HDV
HDV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
HDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDV Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
HDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDV Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLS vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celestica Inc. (CLS) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

CLSHDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.17
2.13

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.46
3.13

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.36

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.42

4.09

+1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.78

11.19

+1.59

CLS vs. HDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLS Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the HDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLS and HDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CLS vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLS drawdown since its inception was -96.93%, which is greater than HDV's maximum drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLS and HDV.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

CLSHDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.93%

-37.04%

-59.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.24%

-5.18%

-24.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.96%

-10.49%

-43.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.96%

-15.42%

-38.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.60%

-37.04%

-43.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.66%

-1.35%

-24.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-73.27%

-3.08%

-70.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.38%

1.89%

+10.49%

Volatility

CLS vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison

Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a higher volatility of 27.86% compared to iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) at 3.64%. This indicates that CLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

CLSHDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.86%

3.64%

+24.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.05%

7.61%

+46.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

73.04%

9.93%

+63.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.84%

12.81%

+45.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.05%

15.73%

+34.32%

Dividends

CLS vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison

CLS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CLS
Celestica Inc.		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF		2.90%3.22%3.67%3.82%3.56%3.47%4.07%3.27%3.67%3.27%3.28%3.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

CLS and HDV have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CLS has higher volatility (27.86%) compared to HDV (3.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLS dropped -96.93% vs HDV's -37.04%.

CLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLS and HDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer