CLIM vs. SCHH
CLIM (Climate Global - Climate-Resilient REIT Index ETF) and SCHH (Schwab US REIT ETF) are both REIT funds - CLIM tracks the Climate Global Climate-Resilient REIT Index (CLIMX) while SCHH tracks the Dow Jones Equity All REIT Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. CLIM charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for SCHH.
Performance
CLIM vs. SCHH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CLIM
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 2.42%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SCHH
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 2.23%
- 6M
- 17.81%
- YTD
- 20.01%
- 1Y
- 17.83%
- 3Y*
- 11.15%
- 5Y*
- 3.68%
- 10Y*
- 3.80%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.30%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.25K | $5.06K | $6.36K | |
| $131.48M | $149.41M | $140.61M |
CLIM vs. SCHH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CLIM Climate Global - Climate-Resilient REIT Index ETF | 13.70% |
SCHH Schwab US REIT ETF | 12.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLIM and SCHH is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2026 | 0.96 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLIM vs. SCHH — Risk / Return Rank
CLIM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SCHH
CLIM vs. SCHH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Climate Global - Climate-Resilient REIT Index ETF (CLIM) and Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLIM | SCHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.23 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.16 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.02 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLIM vs. SCHH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLIM drawdown since its inception was -6.41%, smaller than the maximum SCHH drawdown of -44.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLIM and SCHH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLIM | SCHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.41% | -44.22% | +37.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | -0.40% | +0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.34% | -9.37% | +8.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.58% | — |
Volatility
CLIM vs. SCHH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLIM | SCHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.85% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.98% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.90% | 14.14% | +1.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.90% | 18.79% | -2.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.90% | 21.03% | -5.13% |
CLIM vs. SCHH - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLIM has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHH's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLIM vs. SCHH - Dividend Comparison
CLIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than SCHH's 2.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLIM Climate Global - Climate-Resilient REIT Index ETF | 1.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHH Schwab US REIT ETF | 2.67% | 3.04% | 3.22% | 3.24% | 2.55% | 1.50% | 2.86% | 2.86% | 3.64% | 2.22% | 2.81% | 2.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, CLIM and SCHH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SCHH is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHH is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for CLIM.
SCHH has the higher dividend yield at 2.67%, compared with 1.12% for CLIM.
CLIM tracks Climate Global Climate-Resilient REIT Index (CLIMX), while SCHH tracks Dow Jones Equity All REIT Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Climate Global and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for CLIM and 0.07% for SCHH.
Find the right allocation for CLIM and SCHH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer