CLIM vs. FRI
CLIM (Climate Global - Climate-Resilient REIT Index ETF) and FRI (First Trust S&P REIT Index Fund) are both REIT funds - CLIM tracks the Climate Global Climate-Resilient REIT Index (CLIMX) while FRI tracks the S&P United States REIT. Both are passively managed. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. CLIM charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FRI.
Performance
CLIM vs. FRI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CLIM
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 2.42%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
FRI
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 2.98%
- 6M
- 20.21%
- YTD
- 22.59%
- 1Y
- 23.73%
- 3Y*
- 12.76%
- 5Y*
- 5.40%
- 10Y*
- 5.53%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.44%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.25K | $5.06K | $6.36K | |
| $1.60M | $1.20M | $863.94K |
CLIM vs. FRI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CLIM Climate Global - Climate-Resilient REIT Index ETF | 13.70% |
FRI First Trust S&P REIT Index Fund | 13.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLIM and FRI is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2026 | 0.96 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLIM vs. FRI — Risk / Return Rank
CLIM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FRI
CLIM vs. FRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Climate Global - Climate-Resilient REIT Index ETF (CLIM) and First Trust S&P REIT Index Fund (FRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLIM | FRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.15 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.16 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLIM vs. FRI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLIM drawdown since its inception was -6.41%, smaller than the maximum FRI drawdown of -71.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLIM and FRI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLIM | FRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.41% | -71.95% | +65.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | -0.48% | +0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.34% | -13.60% | +12.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.34% | — |
Volatility
CLIM vs. FRI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLIM | FRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.78% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.59% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.90% | 13.96% | +1.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.90% | 18.70% | -2.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.90% | 21.12% | -5.22% |
CLIM vs. FRI - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLIM has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than FRI's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLIM vs. FRI - Dividend Comparison
CLIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than FRI's 2.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLIM Climate Global - Climate-Resilient REIT Index ETF | 1.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FRI First Trust S&P REIT Index Fund | 2.34% | 2.99% | 3.33% | 3.24% | 2.52% | 1.44% | 3.08% | 2.28% | 3.21% | 2.82% | 3.27% | 2.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, CLIM and FRI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, FRI is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FRI is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for CLIM.
FRI has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 1.12% for CLIM.
CLIM tracks Climate Global Climate-Resilient REIT Index (CLIMX), while FRI tracks S&P United States REIT. They also come from different issuers: Climate Global and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for CLIM and 0.50% for FRI.
Find the right allocation for CLIM and FRI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer