CLIM vs. SRET
CLIM (Climate Global - Climate-Resilient REIT Index ETF) and SRET (Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF) are both REIT funds - CLIM tracks the Climate Global Climate-Resilient REIT Index (CLIMX) while SRET tracks the Solactive Global SuperDividend REIT Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CLIM charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for SRET.
Performance
CLIM vs. SRET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CLIM
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 2.42%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SRET
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 2.26%
- 6M
- 5.85%
- YTD
- 10.36%
- 1Y
- 16.61%
- 3Y*
- 9.20%
- 5Y*
- 2.94%
- 10Y*
- 0.81%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.00%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.25K | $5.06K | $6.36K | |
| $747.98K | $778.27K | $835.25K |
CLIM vs. SRET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CLIM Climate Global - Climate-Resilient REIT Index ETF | 13.70% |
SRET Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF | 7.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLIM and SRET is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2026 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLIM vs. SRET — Risk / Return Rank
CLIM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SRET
CLIM vs. SRET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Climate Global - Climate-Resilient REIT Index ETF (CLIM) and Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLIM | SRET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.76 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.27 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLIM vs. SRET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLIM drawdown since its inception was -6.41%, smaller than the maximum SRET drawdown of -66.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLIM and SRET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLIM | SRET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.41% | -66.98% | +60.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | -19.39% | +19.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.34% | -22.46% | +21.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.29% | — |
Volatility
CLIM vs. SRET - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLIM | SRET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.32% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.47% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.90% | 11.64% | +4.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.90% | 16.44% | -0.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.90% | 24.60% | -8.70% |
CLIM vs. SRET - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLIM has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than SRET's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLIM vs. SRET - Dividend Comparison
CLIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than SRET's 7.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLIM Climate Global - Climate-Resilient REIT Index ETF | 1.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRET Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF | 7.73% | 7.98% | 8.72% | 7.21% | 8.30% | 6.33% | 8.88% | 7.83% | 8.54% | 8.20% | 8.08% | 7.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLIM and SRET have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SRET is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SRET is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for CLIM.
SRET has the higher dividend yield at 7.73%, compared with 1.12% for CLIM.
CLIM tracks Climate Global Climate-Resilient REIT Index (CLIMX), while SRET tracks Solactive Global SuperDividend REIT Index. They also come from different issuers: Climate Global and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for CLIM and 0.58% for SRET.
Find the right allocation for CLIM and SRET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer