CLIM vs. URE
CLIM (Climate Global - Climate-Resilient REIT Index ETF) and URE (ProShares Ultra Real Estate) are both REIT funds - CLIM tracks the Climate Global Climate-Resilient REIT Index (CLIMX) while URE tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CLIM charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for URE.
Performance
CLIM vs. URE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CLIM
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 4.19%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
URE
- 1D
- 2.83%
- 1M
- 2.08%
- 6M
- 20.33%
- YTD
- 22.47%
- 1Y
- 16.06%
- 3Y*
- 9.37%
- 5Y*
- -3.16%
- 10Y*
- 2.32%
CLIM vs. URE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CLIM Climate Global - Climate-Resilient REIT Index ETF | 11.62% |
URE ProShares Ultra Real Estate | 12.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLIM and URE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2026 | 0.92 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLIM vs. URE — Risk / Return Rank
CLIM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
URE
CLIM vs. URE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Climate Global - Climate-Resilient REIT Index ETF (CLIM) and ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLIM | URE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.12 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.98 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.36 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLIM vs. URE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLIM drawdown since its inception was -6.41%, smaller than the maximum URE drawdown of -97.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLIM and URE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLIM | URE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.41% | -97.16% | +90.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -33.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -63.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -70.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -49.15% | +49.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.45% | -64.44% | +62.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.81% | — |
Volatility
CLIM vs. URE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLIM | URE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.03% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 22.03% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.95% | 28.20% | -12.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.95% | 37.52% | -21.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.95% | 40.64% | -24.69% |
CLIM vs. URE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLIM has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than URE's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLIM vs. URE - Dividend Comparison
CLIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than URE's 1.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLIM Climate Global - Climate-Resilient REIT Index ETF | 1.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
URE ProShares Ultra Real Estate | 1.99% | 2.42% | 2.09% | 1.32% | 1.26% | 0.58% | 0.94% | 1.10% | 1.53% | 0.93% | 0.96% | 0.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, CLIM and URE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, CLIM is cheaper at 0.90% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CLIM is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for URE.
URE has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 1.14% for CLIM.
CLIM tracks Climate Global Climate-Resilient REIT Index (CLIMX), while URE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Climate Global and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for CLIM and 0.95% for URE.
Find the right allocation for CLIM and URE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer