PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SCHH vs. REET
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between SCHH and REET is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

SCHH vs. REET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

40.00%45.00%50.00%55.00%60.00%65.00%70.00%75.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
58.29%
44.73%
SCHH
REET

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SCHH:

0.57

REET:

0.46

Sortino Ratio

SCHH:

0.86

REET:

0.71

Omega Ratio

SCHH:

1.11

REET:

1.09

Calmar Ratio

SCHH:

0.36

REET:

0.28

Martin Ratio

SCHH:

2.12

REET:

1.62

Ulcer Index

SCHH:

4.28%

REET:

4.08%

Daily Std Dev

SCHH:

15.94%

REET:

14.33%

Max Drawdown

SCHH:

-44.22%

REET:

-44.59%

Current Drawdown

SCHH:

-12.20%

REET:

-13.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHH achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly higher than REET's 0.21% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHH has outperformed REET with an annualized return of 2.94%, while REET has yielded a comparatively lower 2.62% annualized return.


SCHH

YTD

0.28%

1M

1.20%

6M

1.75%

1Y

9.90%

5Y*

0.69%

10Y*

2.94%

REET

YTD

0.21%

1M

1.39%

6M

0.83%

1Y

7.34%

5Y*

0.06%

10Y*

2.62%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SCHH vs. REET - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHH has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than REET's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


REET
iShares Global REIT ETF
Expense ratio chart for REET: current value at 0.14% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.14%
Expense ratio chart for SCHH: current value at 0.07% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.07%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

SCHH vs. REET — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SCHH is 2222
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SCHH is 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SCHH is 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SCHH is 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SCHH is 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SCHH is 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

REET
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of REET is 1818
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of REET is 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of REET is 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of REET is 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of REET is 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of REET is 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SCHH vs. REET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SCHH, currently valued at 0.57, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.570.46
The chart of Sortino ratio for SCHH, currently valued at 0.86, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.000.860.71
The chart of Omega ratio for SCHH, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market1.002.003.001.111.09
The chart of Calmar ratio for SCHH, currently valued at 0.36, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.360.28
The chart of Martin ratio for SCHH, currently valued at 2.12, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.002.121.62
SCHH
REET

The current SCHH Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is comparable to the REET Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHH and REET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.57
0.46
SCHH
REET

Dividends

SCHH vs. REET - Dividend Comparison

SCHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, less than REET's 3.63% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
SCHH
Schwab US REIT ETF
3.21%3.22%3.24%2.55%1.50%2.86%2.87%3.66%2.22%2.81%2.48%2.18%
REET
iShares Global REIT ETF
3.63%3.63%3.27%2.42%3.18%2.64%5.25%5.73%3.84%5.37%3.56%2.12%

Drawdowns

SCHH vs. REET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHH drawdown since its inception was -44.22%, roughly equal to the maximum REET drawdown of -44.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHH and REET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-16.00%-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-12.20%
-13.91%
SCHH
REET

Volatility

SCHH vs. REET - Volatility Comparison

Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) has a higher volatility of 6.70% compared to iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) at 5.75%. This indicates that SCHH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
6.70%
5.75%
SCHH
REET
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab