PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHH vs. XLRE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHH vs. XLRE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) and Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLRE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHH achieves a 15.41% return, which is significantly higher than XLRE's 12.35% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHH has underperformed XLRE with an annualized return of 4.29%, while XLRE has yielded a comparatively higher 6.92% annualized return.


SCHH

1D
1.31%
1M
1.22%
YTD
15.41%
6M
16.02%
1Y
14.47%
3Y*
12.09%
5Y*
3.68%
10Y*
4.29%

XLRE

1D
1.41%
1M
1.06%
YTD
12.35%
6M
12.83%
1Y
9.79%
3Y*
11.31%
5Y*
3.53%
10Y*
6.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHH vs. XLRE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHH
Schwab US REIT ETF
15.41%2.20%4.99%11.18%-24.99%41.07%-14.81%22.85%-4.26%3.68%
XLRE
Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund
12.35%2.63%5.09%12.36%-26.25%46.10%-2.18%28.68%-2.39%10.69%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHH and XLRE is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2015

0.96

The correlation between SCHH and XLRE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHH vs. XLRE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHH
SCHH Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
SCHH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHH Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHH Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

XLRE
XLRE Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
XLRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLRE Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
XLRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLRE Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHH vs. XLRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) and Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHHXLREDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.13

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

1.18

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.48

3.23

+2.26

SCHH vs. XLRE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHH Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is higher than the XLRE Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHH and XLRE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHH vs. XLRE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHH drawdown since its inception was -44.22%, which is greater than XLRE's maximum drawdown of -38.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHH and XLRE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHHXLREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.22%

-38.83%

-5.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.28%

-8.33%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.76%

-16.74%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.28%

-34.12%

+0.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.22%

-38.83%

-5.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

-0.72%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.42%

-9.56%

+0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

3.04%

-0.39%

Volatility

SCHH vs. XLRE - Volatility Comparison

Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) and Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLRE) have volatilities of 5.37% and 5.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHHXLREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.37%

5.35%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.42%

10.63%

-0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.89%

14.17%

-0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.77%

19.13%

-0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.02%

20.45%

+0.57%

SCHH vs. XLRE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHH has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than XLRE's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHH vs. XLRE - Dividend Comparison

SCHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, less than XLRE's 3.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHH
Schwab US REIT ETF
2.72%3.04%3.22%3.24%2.55%1.50%2.86%2.86%3.64%2.22%2.81%2.48%
XLRE
Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund
3.15%3.45%3.43%3.31%3.70%2.61%3.15%3.06%3.78%3.25%4.22%1.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, SCHH and XLRE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SCHH has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to XLRE (5.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHH dropped -44.22% vs XLRE's -38.83%.

On 10-year performance, XLRE leads with 6.92% vs 4.29% for SCHH. On fees, SCHH is cheaper at 0.07% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLRE has performed better with a 6.92% return vs 4.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHH is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for XLRE.

XLRE has the higher dividend yield at 3.15%, compared with 2.72% for SCHH.

SCHH tracks Dow Jones Equity All REIT Capped Index, while XLRE tracks Real Estate Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SCHH and 0.13% for XLRE.

SCHH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHH and XLRE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer