PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHH vs. VNQI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHH vs. VNQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) and Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHH achieves a 17.68% return, which is significantly higher than VNQI's 0.41% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHH has outperformed VNQI with an annualized return of 3.73%, while VNQI has yielded a comparatively lower 2.19% annualized return.


SCHH

1D
-0.49%
1M
0.87%
6M
14.82%
YTD
17.68%
1Y
19.86%
3Y*
10.28%
5Y*
3.28%
10Y*
3.73%
ALL TIME*
7.16%

VNQI

1D
-1.14%
1M
1.54%
6M
-3.98%
YTD
0.41%
1Y
5.97%
3Y*
8.04%
5Y*
-0.65%
10Y*
2.19%
ALL TIME*
3.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$134.76M$145.46M$140.74M
$9.76M$10.10M$13.18M

SCHH vs. VNQI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHH
Schwab US REIT ETF
17.68%2.20%4.99%11.18%-24.99%41.07%-14.81%22.85%-4.26%3.68%
VNQI
Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF
0.41%21.38%-2.22%6.99%-22.94%5.93%-7.22%21.59%-9.44%26.91%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHH and VNQI is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2011

0.58

The correlation between SCHH and VNQI shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.62 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHH vs. VNQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SCHH
SCHH Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SCHH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHH Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHH Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

VNQI
VNQI Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
VNQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNQI Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
VNQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNQI Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SCHH vs. VNQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) and Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHHVNQIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.09

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

0.45

+1.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.96

1.03

+6.93

SCHH vs. VNQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHH Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is higher than the VNQI Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHH and VNQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHH vs. VNQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHH drawdown since its inception was -44.22%, which is greater than VNQI's maximum drawdown of -38.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHH and VNQI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHHVNQIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.22%

-38.35%

-5.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.28%

-14.78%

+6.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.76%

-16.35%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.28%

-34.92%

+1.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.22%

-38.35%

-5.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.33%

-9.32%

+6.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.36%

-10.88%

+1.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

6.45%

-3.98%

Volatility

SCHH vs. VNQI - Volatility Comparison

Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) has a higher volatility of 4.56% compared to Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI) at 3.59%. This indicates that SCHH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VNQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHHVNQIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.56%

3.59%

+0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.96%

12.15%

-1.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.92%

13.93%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.79%

15.57%

+3.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.03%

15.92%

+5.11%

SCHH vs. VNQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHH has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than VNQI's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHH vs. VNQI - Dividend Comparison

SCHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, less than VNQI's 4.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHH
Schwab US REIT ETF
2.72%3.04%3.22%3.24%2.55%1.50%2.86%2.86%3.64%2.22%2.81%2.48%
VNQI
Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF
4.68%4.70%5.16%3.74%0.57%6.48%0.93%7.58%4.62%3.86%5.18%2.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHH and VNQI have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHH has higher volatility (4.56%) compared to VNQI (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHH dropped -44.22% vs VNQI's -38.35%.

On 10-year performance, SCHH leads with 3.73% vs 2.19% for VNQI. On fees, SCHH is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VNQI has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHH has performed better with a 3.73% return vs 2.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHH is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for VNQI.

VNQI has the higher dividend yield at 4.68%, compared with 2.72% for SCHH.

SCHH tracks Dow Jones Equity All REIT Capped Index, while VNQI tracks S&P Global ex-U.S. Property Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SCHH and 0.12% for VNQI.

SCHH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHH and VNQI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer