CLIM vs. FREL
CLIM (Climate Global - Climate-Resilient REIT Index ETF) and FREL (Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF) are both REIT funds - CLIM tracks the Climate Global Climate-Resilient REIT Index (CLIMX) while FREL tracks the MSCI USA IMI Real Estate Index. Both are passively managed. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. CLIM charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FREL.
Performance
CLIM vs. FREL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CLIM
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 4.19%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FREL
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- 2.73%
- 6M
- 12.30%
- YTD
- 13.38%
- 1Y
- 14.37%
- 3Y*
- 9.80%
- 5Y*
- 2.90%
- 10Y*
- 5.58%
CLIM vs. FREL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CLIM Climate Global - Climate-Resilient REIT Index ETF | 11.62% |
FREL Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF | 8.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLIM and FREL is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2026 | 0.96 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLIM vs. FREL — Risk / Return Rank
CLIM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FREL
CLIM vs. FREL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Climate Global - Climate-Resilient REIT Index ETF (CLIM) and Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF (FREL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLIM | FREL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.19 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.71 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.36 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLIM vs. FREL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLIM drawdown since its inception was -6.41%, smaller than the maximum FREL drawdown of -42.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLIM and FREL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLIM | FREL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.41% | -42.61% | +36.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.13% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.45% | -9.88% | +8.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.69% | — |
Volatility
CLIM vs. FREL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLIM | FREL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.56% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.95% | 13.87% | +2.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.95% | 18.94% | -2.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.95% | 20.71% | -4.76% |
CLIM vs. FREL - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLIM has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than FREL's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLIM vs. FREL - Dividend Comparison
CLIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than FREL's 3.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLIM Climate Global - Climate-Resilient REIT Index ETF | 1.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FREL Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF | 3.22% | 3.59% | 3.48% | 3.73% | 3.57% | 2.34% | 3.77% | 3.32% | 5.54% | 3.27% | 4.01% | 3.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, CLIM and FREL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, FREL is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FREL is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for CLIM.
FREL has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 1.14% for CLIM.
CLIM tracks Climate Global Climate-Resilient REIT Index (CLIMX), while FREL tracks MSCI USA IMI Real Estate Index. They also come from different issuers: Climate Global and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for CLIM and 0.08% for FREL.
Find the right allocation for CLIM and FREL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer