CLDT vs. VOO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).

VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010.

Performance

CLDT vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CLDT vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CLDT Chatham Lodging Trust	16.32%	-19.89%	-13.83%	-10.13%	-10.05%	27.04%	-40.30%	11.32%	-17.05%	18.06%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	-3.66%	17.82%	24.98%	26.32%	-18.17%	28.79%	18.32%	31.37%	-4.50%	21.77%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLDT achieves a 16.32% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's -3.66% return. Over the past 10 years, CLDT has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of -5.59%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.14% annualized return.

CLDT

• 1D: -0.64%
• 1M: 3.68%
• YTD: 16.32%
• 6M: 21.41%
• 1Y: 15.34%
• 3Y*: -5.71%
• 5Y*: -8.16%
• 10Y*: -5.59%

VOO

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: -4.29%
• YTD: -3.66%
• 6M: -1.41%
• 1Y: 18.17%
• 3Y*: 18.58%
• 5Y*: 11.93%
• 10Y*: 14.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CLDT vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLDT

CLDT Risk / Return Rank: 56
CLDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
CLDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
CLDT Omega Ratio Rank: 51
CLDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
CLDT Martin Ratio Rank: 58

VOO

VOO Risk / Return Rank: 60
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 61
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLDT vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CLDT	VOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.48	1.01	-0.52
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.96	1.53	-0.58
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.23	-0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.83	1.55	-0.73
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.81	7.31	-5.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CLDT vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLDT Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLDT and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLDT	VOO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48	1.01	-0.52
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.25	0.71	-0.96
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.13	0.79	-0.92
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.05	0.83	-0.88

Correlation

The correlation between CLDT and VOO is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CLDT vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

CLDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, more than VOO's 1.18% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CLDT Chatham Lodging Trust	4.73%	5.29%	3.13%	2.61%	0.57%	0.00%	2.04%	7.20%	7.47%	5.80%	6.72%	5.86%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	1.18%	1.13%	1.24%	1.46%	1.69%	1.25%	1.54%	1.88%	2.06%	1.78%	2.02%	2.10%

Drawdowns

CLDT vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLDT drawdown since its inception was -83.52%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLDT and VOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLDT	VOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.52%	-33.99%	-49.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.75%	-11.98%	-6.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.84%	-24.52%	-31.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-81.52%	-33.99%	-47.53%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-60.97%	-5.55%	-55.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.14%	-3.72%	-29.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.57%	2.55%	+6.02%

Volatility

CLDT vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) has a higher volatility of 12.11% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 5.34%. This indicates that CLDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLDT	VOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.11%	5.34%	+6.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.46%	9.47%	+10.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.85%	18.11%	+13.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.87%	16.82%	+16.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.88%	17.99%	+24.89%