CLDT vs. PECO
Compare and contrast key facts about Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CLDT or PECO.
Key characteristics
| CLDT | PECO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -16.10% | -8.88% |
| 1Y Return | -7.38% | 15.14% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.25 | 0.71 |
| Daily Std Dev | 28.36% | 21.46% |
| Max Drawdown | -83.52% | -23.11% |
| Current Drawdown | -59.23% | -10.76% |
Fundamentals
| CLDT | PECO | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $455.98M | $4.48B |
| EPS | -$0.12 | $0.48 |
| PE Ratio | 342.00 | 68.52 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $310.74M | $620.36M |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $147.24M | $412.15M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $90.19M | $392.96M |
Correlation
The correlation between CLDT and PECO is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CLDT vs. PECO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CLDT achieves a -16.10% return, which is significantly lower than PECO's -8.88% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CLDT vs. PECO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CLDT vs. PECO - Dividend Comparison
CLDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, less than PECO's 3.80% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLDT Chatham Lodging Trust | 3.14% | 2.61% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 2.04% | 7.20% | 7.47% | 5.80% | 6.72% | 5.84% | 3.20% | 4.09% |
PECO Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. | 3.80% | 3.12% | 3.43% | 1.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CLDT vs. PECO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLDT drawdown since its inception was -83.52%, which is greater than PECO's maximum drawdown of -23.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLDT and PECO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CLDT vs. PECO - Volatility Comparison
Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) has a higher volatility of 6.51% compared to Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) at 4.29%. This indicates that CLDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PECO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CLDT vs. PECO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chatham Lodging Trust and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities