CLDT vs. PECO
CLDT (Chatham Lodging Trust) and PECO (Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Real Estate sector — CLDT in REIT - Hotel & Motel, PECO in REIT - Retail. Over the past 3 years, CLDT returned 7.86%/yr vs 12.71%/yr for PECO. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CLDT vs. PECO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLDT achieves a 63.32% return, which is significantly higher than PECO's 11.17% return.
CLDT
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 28.12%
- YTD
- 63.32%
- 6M
- 66.94%
- 1Y
- 61.28%
- 3Y*
- 7.86%
- 5Y*
- -1.57%
- 10Y*
- -3.11%
PECO
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- -1.55%
- YTD
- 11.17%
- 6M
- 13.75%
- 1Y
- 13.47%
- 3Y*
- 12.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLDT vs. PECO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLDT Chatham Lodging Trust | 63.32% | -19.89% | -13.83% | -10.13% | -10.05% | 10.91% |
PECO Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. | 11.17% | -1.59% | 6.20% | 18.53% | -0.33% | 20.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLDT and PECO is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2021 | 0.43 |
Fundamentals
CLDT:
$0.19
PECO:
$1.15
CLDT:
58.97
PECO:
34.03
CLDT:
1.83
PECO:
5.31
CLDT:
$293.94M
PECO:
$739.02M
CLDT:
-$10.45M
PECO:
$525.25M
CLDT:
$80.74M
PECO:
$502.64M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLDT vs. PECO — Risk / Return Rank
CLDT
PECO
CLDT vs. PECO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CLDT | PECO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.15 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | 1.63 | +1.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.45 | 3.74 | +3.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLDT | PECO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.01 | 0.89 | +1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 0.48 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
CLDT vs. PECO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLDT drawdown since its inception was -83.52%, which is greater than PECO's maximum drawdown of -23.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLDT and PECO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLDT | PECO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.52% | -23.11% | -60.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.75% | -8.30% | -10.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.89% | -15.78% | -26.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.20% | -4.58% | -40.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.35% | -6.51% | -26.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.26% | 3.61% | +4.65% |
Volatility
CLDT vs. PECO - Volatility Comparison
Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) has a higher volatility of 13.60% compared to Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) at 4.63%. This indicates that CLDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PECO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLDT | PECO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.60% | 4.63% | +8.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.97% | 10.68% | +13.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.61% | 15.27% | +15.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.08% | 22.58% | +10.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.07% | 22.58% | +20.49% |
Dividends
CLDT vs. PECO - Dividend Comparison
CLDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%, more than PECO's 3.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLDT Chatham Lodging Trust | 3.37% | 5.29% | 3.13% | 2.61% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 2.04% | 7.20% | 7.47% | 5.80% | 6.72% | 5.86% |
PECO Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. | 3.29% | 3.52% | 3.18% | 3.12% | 3.43% | 1.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CLDT vs. PECO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chatham Lodging Trust and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CLDT vs. PECO - Profitability Comparison
CLDT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chatham Lodging Trust reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 67.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
PECO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 135.68M and revenue of 190.74M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.1%.
CLDT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chatham Lodging Trust reported an operating income of 1.64M and revenue of 67.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.4%.
PECO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 58.21M and revenue of 190.74M, resulting in an operating margin of 30.5%.
CLDT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chatham Lodging Trust reported a net income of -4.42M and revenue of 67.50M, resulting in a net margin of -6.5%.
PECO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. reported a net income of 30.38M and revenue of 190.74M, resulting in a net margin of 15.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CLDT and PECO have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLDT has higher volatility (13.60%) compared to PECO (4.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLDT dropped -83.52% vs PECO's -23.11%.
CLDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CLDT and PECO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer