PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CLDT vs. PECO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CLDTPECO
YTD Return-14.02%9.26%
1Y Return-7.70%14.86%
3Y Return (Ann)-9.91%7.88%
Sharpe Ratio-0.290.79
Sortino Ratio-0.231.22
Omega Ratio0.971.15
Calmar Ratio-0.130.94
Martin Ratio-0.502.12
Ulcer Index16.59%7.00%
Daily Std Dev29.19%18.79%
Max Drawdown-83.52%-23.11%
Current Drawdown-58.22%-1.75%

Fundamentals


CLDTPECO
Market Cap$466.10M$5.32B
EPS-$0.22$0.47
Total Revenue (TTM)$314.38M$645.18M
Gross Profit (TTM)$146.07M$279.24M
EBITDA (TTM)$73.43M$410.63M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between CLDT and PECO is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

CLDT vs. PECO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CLDT achieves a -14.02% return, which is significantly lower than PECO's 9.26% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.01%
20.34%
CLDT
PECO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CLDT vs. PECO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLDT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CLDT, currently valued at -0.26, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.26
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CLDT, currently valued at -0.19, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.19
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CLDT, currently valued at 0.98, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.98
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CLDT, currently valued at -0.17, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.17
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CLDT, currently valued at -0.46, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.46
PECO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PECO, currently valued at 0.79, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.79
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PECO, currently valued at 1.22, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.22
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PECO, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.15
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PECO, currently valued at 0.94, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.94
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PECO, currently valued at 2.12, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.002.12

CLDT vs. PECO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLDT Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the PECO Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLDT and PECO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.26
0.79
CLDT
PECO

Dividends

CLDT vs. PECO - Dividend Comparison

CLDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, less than PECO's 3.31% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CLDT
Chatham Lodging Trust
3.11%2.61%0.57%0.00%2.04%7.20%7.47%5.80%6.72%5.86%3.21%4.11%
PECO
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
3.31%3.12%3.43%1.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CLDT vs. PECO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLDT drawdown since its inception was -83.52%, which is greater than PECO's maximum drawdown of -23.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLDT and PECO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-36.26%
-1.75%
CLDT
PECO

Volatility

CLDT vs. PECO - Volatility Comparison

Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) has a higher volatility of 13.22% compared to Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) at 4.67%. This indicates that CLDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PECO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
13.22%
4.67%
CLDT
PECO

Financials

CLDT vs. PECO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chatham Lodging Trust and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items