CLDT vs. DRH
CLDT (Chatham Lodging Trust) and DRH (DiamondRock Hospitality Company) are both stocks. Both operate in the REIT - Hotel & Motel industry within the Real Estate sector. Over the past 10 years, CLDT returned -3.11%/yr vs 5.21%/yr for DRH. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
CLDT vs. DRH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLDT achieves a 63.32% return, which is significantly higher than DRH's 26.89% return. Over the past 10 years, CLDT has underperformed DRH with an annualized return of -3.11%, while DRH has yielded a comparatively higher 5.21% annualized return.
CLDT
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 28.12%
- YTD
- 63.32%
- 6M
- 66.94%
- 1Y
- 61.28%
- 3Y*
- 7.86%
- 5Y*
- -1.57%
- 10Y*
- -3.11%
DRH
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 10.07%
- YTD
- 26.89%
- 6M
- 29.58%
- 1Y
- 54.07%
- 3Y*
- 14.44%
- 5Y*
- 4.43%
- 10Y*
- 5.21%
CLDT vs. DRH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLDT Chatham Lodging Trust | 63.32% | -19.89% | -13.83% | -10.13% | -10.05% | 27.04% | -40.30% | 11.32% | -17.05% | 18.06% |
DRH DiamondRock Hospitality Company | 26.89% | 3.66% | -0.35% | 16.35% | -13.80% | 16.48% | -25.54% | 29.77% | -16.84% | 2.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLDT and DRH is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2010 | 0.67 |
The correlation between CLDT and DRH shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (all time) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CLDT:
$518.82M
DRH:
$2.33B
CLDT:
$0.19
DRH:
$0.50
CLDT:
58.97
DRH:
22.44
CLDT:
1.83
DRH:
2.08
CLDT:
0.72
DRH:
1.61
CLDT:
$293.94M
DRH:
$1.12B
CLDT:
-$10.45M
DRH:
$483.67M
CLDT:
$80.74M
DRH:
$279.39M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLDT vs. DRH — Risk / Return Rank
CLDT
DRH
CLDT vs. DRH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) and DiamondRock Hospitality Company (DRH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CLDT | DRH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.36 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | 4.56 | -1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.45 | 11.73 | -4.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLDT | DRH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.01 | 2.09 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | 0.13 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.07 | 0.11 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 0.08 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
CLDT vs. DRH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLDT drawdown since its inception was -83.52%, roughly equal to the maximum DRH drawdown of -86.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLDT and DRH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLDT | DRH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.52% | -86.50% | +2.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.75% | -11.92% | -6.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.89% | -31.90% | -9.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.84% | -37.93% | -17.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.52% | -81.97% | +0.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.20% | -2.62% | -42.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.35% | -32.01% | -1.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.26% | 4.62% | +3.64% |
Volatility
CLDT vs. DRH - Volatility Comparison
Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) has a higher volatility of 13.60% compared to DiamondRock Hospitality Company (DRH) at 7.48%. This indicates that CLDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLDT | DRH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.60% | 7.48% | +6.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.97% | 17.99% | +5.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.61% | 25.95% | +4.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.08% | 33.31% | -0.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.07% | 46.76% | -3.69% |
Dividends
CLDT vs. DRH - Dividend Comparison
CLDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%, more than DRH's 3.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLDT Chatham Lodging Trust | 3.37% | 5.29% | 3.13% | 2.61% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 2.04% | 7.20% | 7.47% | 5.80% | 6.72% | 5.86% |
DRH DiamondRock Hospitality Company | 3.29% | 4.02% | 3.54% | 1.28% | 1.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.64% | 4.13% | 4.43% | 4.34% | 5.18% |
Financials
CLDT vs. DRH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chatham Lodging Trust and DiamondRock Hospitality Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CLDT vs. DRH - Profitability Comparison
CLDT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chatham Lodging Trust reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 67.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
DRH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DiamondRock Hospitality Company reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 258.16M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CLDT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chatham Lodging Trust reported an operating income of 1.64M and revenue of 67.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.4%.
DRH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DiamondRock Hospitality Company reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 258.16M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
CLDT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chatham Lodging Trust reported a net income of -4.42M and revenue of 67.50M, resulting in a net margin of -6.5%.
DRH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DiamondRock Hospitality Company reported a net income of 14.46M and revenue of 258.16M, resulting in a net margin of 5.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CLDT and DRH have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLDT has higher volatility (13.60%) compared to DRH (7.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLDT dropped -83.52% vs DRH's -86.50%.
DRH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CLDT and DRH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer