CLDT vs. VONG

In the year-to-date period, CLDT achieves a -17.52% return, which is significantly lower than VONG's -2.52% return. Over the past 10 years, CLDT has underperformed VONG with an annualized return of -9.15%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively higher 15.71% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CLDT Sharpe Ratio is -0.49, which is lower than the VONG Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLDT and VONG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

CLDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, more than VONG's 0.55% yield.

The maximum CLDT drawdown since its inception was -83.52%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLDT and VONG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) is 6.45%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a volatility of 7.89%. This indicates that CLDT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.