CLDT vs. APLE
CLDT (Chatham Lodging Trust) and APLE (Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the REIT - Hotel & Motel industry within the Real Estate sector. Over the past 10 years, CLDT returned -3.11%/yr vs 3.43%/yr for APLE. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
CLDT vs. APLE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLDT achieves a 63.32% return, which is significantly higher than APLE's 32.29% return. Over the past 10 years, CLDT has underperformed APLE with an annualized return of -3.11%, while APLE has yielded a comparatively higher 3.43% annualized return.
CLDT
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 28.12%
- YTD
- 63.32%
- 6M
- 66.94%
- 1Y
- 61.28%
- 3Y*
- 7.86%
- 5Y*
- -1.57%
- 10Y*
- -3.11%
APLE
- 1D
- 1.67%
- 1M
- 16.05%
- YTD
- 32.29%
- 6M
- 33.75%
- 1Y
- 41.36%
- 3Y*
- 6.97%
- 5Y*
- 4.75%
- 10Y*
- 3.43%
CLDT vs. APLE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLDT Chatham Lodging Trust | 63.32% | -19.89% | -13.83% | -10.13% | -10.05% | 27.04% | -40.30% | 11.32% | -17.05% | 18.06% |
APLE Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. | 32.29% | -16.61% | -1.26% | 12.31% | 2.41% | 25.42% | -18.91% | 21.97% | -21.64% | 3.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLDT and APLE is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2015 | 0.71 |
The correlation between CLDT and APLE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
CLDT:
$518.82M
APLE:
$3.59B
CLDT:
$0.19
APLE:
$0.72
CLDT:
58.97
APLE:
20.96
CLDT:
1.83
APLE:
2.53
CLDT:
0.72
APLE:
1.15
CLDT:
$293.94M
APLE:
$1.42B
CLDT:
-$10.45M
APLE:
$673.26M
CLDT:
$80.74M
APLE:
$388.53M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLDT vs. APLE — Risk / Return Rank
CLDT
APLE
CLDT vs. APLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) and Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. (APLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CLDT | APLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.30 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | 3.08 | +0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.45 | 7.12 | +0.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLDT | APLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.01 | 1.83 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | 0.18 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.07 | 0.10 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 0.12 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
CLDT vs. APLE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLDT drawdown since its inception was -83.52%, which is greater than APLE's maximum drawdown of -71.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLDT and APLE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLDT | APLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.52% | -71.83% | -11.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.75% | -13.49% | -5.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.89% | -32.95% | -8.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.84% | -32.95% | -22.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.52% | -71.83% | -9.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.20% | 0.00% | -45.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.35% | -12.41% | -20.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.26% | 5.83% | +2.43% |
Volatility
CLDT vs. APLE - Volatility Comparison
Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) has a higher volatility of 13.60% compared to Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. (APLE) at 8.06%. This indicates that CLDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLDT | APLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.60% | 8.06% | +5.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.97% | 16.54% | +7.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.61% | 22.74% | +7.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.08% | 27.23% | +5.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.07% | 34.53% | +8.54% |
Dividends
CLDT vs. APLE - Dividend Comparison
CLDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%, less than APLE's 6.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APLE Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. | 6.32% | 8.10% | 6.58% | 6.08% | 4.82% | 0.25% | 2.32% | 6.77% | 9.12% | 5.61% | 6.01% | 4.01% |
CLDT Chatham Lodging Trust | 3.37% | 5.29% | 3.13% | 2.61% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 2.04% | 7.20% | 7.47% | 5.80% | 6.72% | 5.86% |
Financials
CLDT vs. APLE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chatham Lodging Trust and Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CLDT vs. APLE - Profitability Comparison
CLDT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chatham Lodging Trust reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 67.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
APLE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. reported a gross profit of 249.08M and revenue of 337.74M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.8%.
CLDT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chatham Lodging Trust reported an operating income of 1.64M and revenue of 67.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.4%.
APLE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. reported an operating income of 48.01M and revenue of 337.74M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.2%.
CLDT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chatham Lodging Trust reported a net income of -4.42M and revenue of 67.50M, resulting in a net margin of -6.5%.
APLE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. reported a net income of 27.70M and revenue of 337.74M, resulting in a net margin of 8.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CLDT and APLE have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLDT has higher volatility (13.60%) compared to APLE (8.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLDT dropped -83.52% vs APLE's -71.83%.
CLDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CLDT and APLE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer