CLDT vs. SCHB
Compare and contrast key facts about Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB).
SCHB is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Nov 3, 2009.
Performance
CLDT vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CLDT vs. SCHB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLDT Chatham Lodging Trust | 17.06% | -19.89% | -13.83% | -10.13% | -10.05% | 27.04% | -40.30% | 11.32% | -17.05% | 18.06% |
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | -4.05% | 16.94% | 23.93% | 26.16% | -19.46% | 25.84% | 20.76% | 30.79% | -5.43% | 21.20% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLDT achieves a 17.06% return, which is significantly higher than SCHB's -4.05% return. Over the past 10 years, CLDT has underperformed SCHB with an annualized return of -5.53%, while SCHB has yielded a comparatively higher 13.57% annualized return.
CLDT
- 1D
- 1.81%
- 1M
- 3.40%
- YTD
- 17.06%
- 6M
- 20.37%
- 1Y
- 16.25%
- 3Y*
- -5.51%
- 5Y*
- -8.04%
- 10Y*
- -5.53%
SCHB
- 1D
- 2.91%
- 1M
- -4.99%
- YTD
- -4.05%
- 6M
- -1.80%
- 1Y
- 17.96%
- 3Y*
- 17.85%
- 5Y*
- 10.52%
- 10Y*
- 13.57%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLDT vs. SCHB — Risk / Return Rank
CLDT
SCHB
CLDT vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CLDT | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.51 | 0.98 | -0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.00 | 1.50 | -0.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.23 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.87 | 1.51 | -0.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.90 | 7.15 | -5.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLDT | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 | 0.98 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.25 | 0.61 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.13 | 0.74 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.05 | 0.78 | -0.83 |
Correlation
The correlation between CLDT and SCHB is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CLDT vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison
CLDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, more than SCHB's 1.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLDT Chatham Lodging Trust | 4.70% | 5.29% | 3.13% | 2.61% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 2.04% | 7.20% | 7.47% | 5.80% | 6.72% | 5.86% |
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | 1.18% | 1.11% | 1.24% | 1.40% | 1.61% | 1.21% | 1.63% | 1.80% | 2.00% | 1.65% | 1.86% | 2.00% |
Drawdowns
CLDT vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLDT drawdown since its inception was -83.52%, which is greater than SCHB's maximum drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLDT and SCHB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLDT | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.52% | -35.27% | -48.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.75% | -12.22% | -6.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.84% | -25.41% | -30.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.52% | -35.27% | -46.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.72% | -6.26% | -54.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.13% | -4.15% | -28.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.57% | 2.58% | +5.99% |
Volatility
CLDT vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison
Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) has a higher volatility of 12.08% compared to Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) at 5.48%. This indicates that CLDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CLDT | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.08% | 5.48% | +6.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.47% | 9.75% | +10.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.84% | 18.33% | +13.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.91% | 17.25% | +15.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.89% | 18.30% | +24.59% |