PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CLDT vs. SCHB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


CLDTSCHB
YTD Return-14.02%27.74%
1Y Return-7.70%37.90%
3Y Return (Ann)-9.91%10.69%
5Y Return (Ann)-11.50%17.51%
10Y Return (Ann)-6.64%15.12%
Sharpe Ratio-0.293.07
Sortino Ratio-0.234.05
Omega Ratio0.971.57
Calmar Ratio-0.134.48
Martin Ratio-0.5019.73
Ulcer Index16.59%1.94%
Daily Std Dev29.19%12.47%
Max Drawdown-83.52%-35.27%
Current Drawdown-58.22%-1.16%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between CLDT and SCHB is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

CLDT vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CLDT achieves a -14.02% return, which is significantly lower than SCHB's 27.74% return. Over the past 10 years, CLDT has underperformed SCHB with an annualized return of -6.64%, while SCHB has yielded a comparatively higher 15.12% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.01%
14.50%
CLDT
SCHB

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CLDT vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLDT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CLDT, currently valued at -0.29, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.29
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CLDT, currently valued at -0.23, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.23
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CLDT, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.97
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CLDT, currently valued at -0.13, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.13
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CLDT, currently valued at -0.50, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.50
SCHB
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SCHB, currently valued at 3.07, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.07
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SCHB, currently valued at 4.05, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.004.05
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SCHB, currently valued at 1.57, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.57
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SCHB, currently valued at 4.48, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.004.48
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SCHB, currently valued at 19.73, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0019.73

CLDT vs. SCHB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLDT Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the SCHB Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLDT and SCHB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.29
3.07
CLDT
SCHB

Dividends

CLDT vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison

CLDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, more than SCHB's 1.19% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CLDT
Chatham Lodging Trust
3.11%2.61%0.57%0.00%2.04%7.20%7.47%5.80%6.72%5.86%3.21%4.11%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
1.19%1.40%1.61%1.21%1.63%1.80%2.13%1.65%1.86%2.00%1.72%1.63%

Drawdowns

CLDT vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLDT drawdown since its inception was -83.52%, which is greater than SCHB's maximum drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLDT and SCHB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-58.22%
-1.16%
CLDT
SCHB

Volatility

CLDT vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison

Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) has a higher volatility of 13.22% compared to Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) at 4.04%. This indicates that CLDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
13.22%
4.04%
CLDT
SCHB