PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CLDT vs. SCHB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CLDT and SCHB is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

CLDT vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.86%
9.01%
CLDT
SCHB

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CLDT:

-0.41

SCHB:

2.15

Sortino Ratio

CLDT:

-0.42

SCHB:

2.85

Omega Ratio

CLDT:

0.95

SCHB:

1.40

Calmar Ratio

CLDT:

-0.19

SCHB:

3.30

Martin Ratio

CLDT:

-0.69

SCHB:

13.13

Ulcer Index

CLDT:

17.52%

SCHB:

2.14%

Daily Std Dev

CLDT:

29.61%

SCHB:

13.10%

Max Drawdown

CLDT:

-83.52%

SCHB:

-35.27%

Current Drawdown

CLDT:

-58.68%

SCHB:

-1.72%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLDT achieves a -1.34% return, which is significantly lower than SCHB's 2.25% return. Over the past 10 years, CLDT has underperformed SCHB with an annualized return of -8.28%, while SCHB has yielded a comparatively higher 12.83% annualized return.


CLDT

YTD

-1.34%

1M

-2.95%

6M

2.07%

1Y

-14.26%

5Y*

-11.80%

10Y*

-8.28%

SCHB

YTD

2.25%

1M

1.35%

6M

8.91%

1Y

25.52%

5Y*

13.76%

10Y*

12.83%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CLDT vs. SCHB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLDT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CLDT is 2727
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CLDT is 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CLDT is 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CLDT is 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CLDT is 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CLDT is 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SCHB is 8181
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SCHB is 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SCHB is 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SCHB is 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SCHB is 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SCHB is 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CLDT vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CLDT, currently valued at -0.41, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.00-0.412.15
The chart of Sortino ratio for CLDT, currently valued at -0.42, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.422.85
The chart of Omega ratio for CLDT, currently valued at 0.95, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.951.40
The chart of Calmar ratio for CLDT, currently valued at -0.19, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.193.30
The chart of Martin ratio for CLDT, currently valued at -0.69, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.6913.13
CLDT
SCHB

The current CLDT Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is lower than the SCHB Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLDT and SCHB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.41
2.15
CLDT
SCHB

Dividends

CLDT vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison

CLDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, more than SCHB's 1.21% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CLDT
Chatham Lodging Trust
3.17%3.13%2.61%0.57%0.00%2.04%7.20%7.47%5.80%6.72%5.86%3.21%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
1.21%1.24%1.40%1.61%1.21%1.63%1.80%2.13%1.65%1.86%2.00%1.72%

Drawdowns

CLDT vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLDT drawdown since its inception was -83.52%, which is greater than SCHB's maximum drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLDT and SCHB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-58.68%
-1.72%
CLDT
SCHB

Volatility

CLDT vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison

Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) has a higher volatility of 8.32% compared to Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) at 5.26%. This indicates that CLDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
8.32%
5.26%
CLDT
SCHB
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab