CL vs. SAIC
CL (Colgate-Palmolive Company) and SAIC (Science Applications International Corporation) are both stocks. CL operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while SAIC operates in Information Technology Services (Technology). Over the past 10 years, CL returned 4.50%/yr vs 8.52%/yr for SAIC. Their 0.27 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CL vs. SAIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CL achieves a 16.93% return, which is significantly lower than SAIC's 19.45% return. Over the past 10 years, CL has underperformed SAIC with an annualized return of 4.50%, while SAIC has yielded a comparatively higher 8.52% annualized return.
CL
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- 6M
- 5.97%
- YTD
- 16.93%
- 1Y
- 5.79%
- 3Y*
- 7.74%
- 5Y*
- 4.19%
- 10Y*
- 4.50%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.27%
SAIC
- 1D
- 2.14%
- 1M
- 11.95%
- 6M
- 8.81%
- YTD
- 19.45%
- 1Y
- 5.12%
- 3Y*
- 1.52%
- 5Y*
- 7.69%
- 10Y*
- 8.52%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.80%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $372.56M | $413.89M | $462.96M | |
| $49.96M | $54.61M | $59.26M |
CL vs. SAIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 16.93% | -10.98% | 16.57% | 3.78% | -5.44% | 2.08% | 27.17% | 18.60% | -19.19% | 17.88% |
SAIC Science Applications International Corporation | 19.45% | -8.73% | -9.04% | 13.58% | 34.95% | -10.20% | 10.81% | 39.15% | -15.48% | -8.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between CL and SAIC is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2013 | 0.27 |
The correlation between CL and SAIC shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CL:
$72.62B
SAIC:
$5.03B
CL:
$2.59
SAIC:
$8.85
CL:
35.08
SAIC:
13.45
CL:
9.06
SAIC:
0.82
CL:
3.52
SAIC:
0.75
CL:
503.88
SAIC:
3.68
CL:
$20.80B
SAIC:
$7.29B
CL:
$12.49B
SAIC:
$912.00M
CL:
$3.92B
SAIC:
$691.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CL vs. SAIC — Risk / Return Rank
CL
SAIC
CL vs. SAIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) and Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CL | SAIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.06 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.31 | 0.16 | +0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.57 | 0.29 | +0.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CL vs. SAIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CL drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, which is greater than SAIC's maximum drawdown of -45.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CL and SAIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CL | SAIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.91% | -45.92% | -12.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.97% | -31.34% | +14.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.05% | -45.74% | +16.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.05% | -45.74% | +16.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.05% | -45.92% | +16.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.56% | -20.91% | +8.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.24% | -12.72% | +1.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.34% | 17.10% | -7.76% |
Volatility
CL vs. SAIC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) is 7.39%, while Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) has a volatility of 10.65%. This indicates that CL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SAIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CL | SAIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.39% | 10.65% | -3.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.72% | 30.83% | -13.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.48% | 39.72% | -17.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.07% | 30.41% | -11.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.87% | 32.68% | -12.81% |
Dividends
CL vs. SAIC - Dividend Comparison
CL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, more than SAIC's 1.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 2.31% | 2.61% | 2.18% | 2.40% | 2.36% | 2.10% | 2.05% | 2.48% | 2.79% | 2.11% | 2.37% | 2.25% |
SAIC Science Applications International Corporation | 1.24% | 1.47% | 1.32% | 1.19% | 1.33% | 1.77% | 1.56% | 1.63% | 1.95% | 1.62% | 1.46% | 2.58% |
Financials
CL vs. SAIC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Colgate-Palmolive Company and Science Applications International Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CL vs. SAIC - Profitability Comparison
CL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a gross profit of 3.23B and revenue of 5.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.6%.
SAIC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Science Applications International Corporation reported a gross profit of 249.00M and revenue of 1.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.1%.
CL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported an operating income of 1.16B and revenue of 5.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.7%.
SAIC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Science Applications International Corporation reported an operating income of 179.00M and revenue of 1.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.
CL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a net income of 646.00M and revenue of 5.32B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.
SAIC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Science Applications International Corporation reported a net income of 115.00M and revenue of 1.91B, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CL and SAIC have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SAIC has higher volatility (10.65%) compared to CL (7.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CL dropped -58.91% vs SAIC's -45.92%.
CL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.23 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CL and SAIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer