CL vs. GS
Compare and contrast key facts about Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CL or GS.
Correlation
The correlation between CL and GS is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CL vs. GS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CL:
0.67
GS:
2.68
CL:
1.01
GS:
3.73
CL:
1.13
GS:
1.50
CL:
0.51
GS:
7.26
CL:
1.31
GS:
24.04
CL:
7.86%
GS:
2.97%
CL:
15.34%
GS:
26.64%
CL:
-58.90%
GS:
-78.84%
CL:
-18.34%
GS:
-0.41%
Fundamentals
CL:
$71.80B
GS:
$199.93B
CL:
$3.48
GS:
$40.54
CL:
25.25
GS:
15.71
CL:
1.98
GS:
3.89
CL:
$15.16B
GS:
$53.16B
CL:
$9.18B
GS:
$53.16B
CL:
$3.77B
GS:
$21.77B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CL achieves a -2.78% return, which is significantly lower than GS's 11.23% return. Over the past 10 years, CL has underperformed GS with an annualized return of 5.49%, while GS has yielded a comparatively higher 16.24% annualized return.
CL
-2.78%
-4.32%
-10.63%
8.40%
7.12%
5.49%
GS
11.23%
9.58%
29.02%
72.67%
24.85%
16.24%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CL vs. GS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CL
GS
CL vs. GS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CL vs. GS - Dividend Comparison
CL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, more than GS's 1.81% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 2.28% | 2.18% | 2.40% | 2.36% | 2.10% | 2.05% | 2.48% | 2.79% | 2.11% | 2.37% | 2.25% | 2.05% |
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 1.81% | 2.01% | 2.72% | 2.62% | 1.70% | 1.90% | 1.80% | 1.89% | 1.14% | 1.09% | 1.41% | 1.16% |
Drawdowns
CL vs. GS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CL drawdown since its inception was -58.90%, smaller than the maximum GS drawdown of -78.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CL and GS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CL vs. GS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) is 3.89%, while The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) has a volatility of 7.88%. This indicates that CL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CL vs. GS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Colgate-Palmolive Company and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities