PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CL vs. PG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CLPG
YTD Return15.52%11.48%
1Y Return19.70%5.72%
3Y Return (Ann)7.61%9.85%
5Y Return (Ann)7.55%11.54%
10Y Return (Ann)5.55%10.05%
Sharpe Ratio1.510.50
Daily Std Dev14.32%14.11%
Max Drawdown-67.62%-54.23%
Current Drawdown0.00%-0.81%

Fundamentals


CLPG
Market Cap$71.62B$373.23B
EPS$2.77$6.12
PE Ratio31.4525.84
PEG Ratio2.153.28
Revenue (TTM)$19.46B$84.06B
Gross Profit (TTM)$10.25B$39.25B
EBITDA (TTM)$4.51B$23.89B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between CL and PG is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

CL vs. PG - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CL achieves a 15.52% return, which is significantly higher than PG's 11.48% return. Over the past 10 years, CL has underperformed PG with an annualized return of 5.55%, while PG has yielded a comparatively higher 10.05% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


10,000.00%15,000.00%20,000.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
9,528.65%
21,262.91%
CL
PG

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Colgate-Palmolive Company

The Procter & Gamble Company

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CL vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CL
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CL, currently valued at 1.51, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.51
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CL, currently valued at 2.11, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.11
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CL, currently valued at 1.27, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.27
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CL, currently valued at 1.37, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.37
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CL, currently valued at 3.33, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.003.33
PG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PG, currently valued at 0.50, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.50
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PG, currently valued at 0.80, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.80
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PG, currently valued at 1.10, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.10
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PG, currently valued at 0.67, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.67
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PG, currently valued at 1.71, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.71

CL vs. PG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CL Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the PG Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of CL and PG.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
1.51
0.50
CL
PG

Dividends

CL vs. PG - Dividend Comparison

CL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, less than PG's 2.37% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CL
Colgate-Palmolive Company
2.13%2.40%2.36%2.10%2.05%2.48%2.79%2.11%2.37%2.25%2.05%2.04%
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
2.37%2.55%2.38%2.08%2.24%2.37%3.09%2.98%3.18%3.31%2.78%2.91%

Drawdowns

CL vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CL drawdown since its inception was -67.62%, which is greater than PG's maximum drawdown of -54.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CL and PG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril0
-0.81%
CL
PG

Volatility

CL vs. PG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) is 3.68%, while The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) has a volatility of 4.06%. This indicates that CL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
3.68%
4.06%
CL
PG

Financials

CL vs. PG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Colgate-Palmolive Company and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items