CL vs. PG
CL (Colgate-Palmolive Company) and PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) are both stocks. Both operate in the Household & Personal Products industry within the Consumer Defensive sector. Over the past 10 years, CL returned 4.44%/yr vs 8.14%/yr for PG. Their 0.50 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
CL vs. PG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CL achieves a 17.64% return, which is significantly higher than PG's 3.07% return. Over the past 10 years, CL has underperformed PG with an annualized return of 4.44%, while PG has yielded a comparatively higher 8.14% annualized return.
CL
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -3.48%
- 6M
- 2.33%
- YTD
- 17.64%
- 1Y
- 12.06%
- 3Y*
- 8.52%
- 5Y*
- 5.29%
- 10Y*
- 4.44%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.28%
PG
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -3.86%
- 6M
- -3.36%
- YTD
- 3.07%
- 1Y
- -1.27%
- 3Y*
- 0.02%
- 5Y*
- 2.93%
- 10Y*
- 8.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.08%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $438.38M | $416.63M | $459.32M | |
| $1.25B | $1.28B | $1.30B |
CL vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 17.64% | -10.98% | 16.57% | 3.78% | -5.44% | 2.08% | 27.17% | 18.60% | -19.19% | 17.88% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 3.07% | -12.26% | 17.25% | -0.86% | -5.05% | 20.52% | 14.15% | 39.70% | 3.57% | 12.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between CL and PG is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1977 | 0.50 |
Over the past year, CL and PG have become more correlated (0.75) than their long-term average of 0.50, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
CL:
$73.06B
PG:
$336.46B
CL:
$2.53
PG:
$6.62
CL:
36.15
PG:
21.84
CL:
9.34
PG:
7.21
CL:
3.50
PG:
4.03
CL:
311.74
PG:
6.44
CL:
$21.05B
PG:
$87.03B
CL:
$12.72B
PG:
$43.67B
CL:
$3.68B
PG:
$21.25B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CL vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank
CL
PG
CL vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CL | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.01 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.69 | -0.07 | +0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.37 | -0.13 | +1.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CL vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CL drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, which is greater than PG's maximum drawdown of -54.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CL and PG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CL | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.91% | -54.25% | -4.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.97% | -15.52% | -1.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.05% | -21.15% | -7.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.05% | -23.77% | -5.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.05% | -23.77% | -5.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.03% | -15.63% | +3.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.24% | -12.17% | +0.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.47% | 9.06% | -0.59% |
Volatility
CL vs. PG - Volatility Comparison
Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) has a higher volatility of 7.62% compared to The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) at 6.95%. This indicates that CL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CL | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.62% | 6.95% | +0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.78% | 15.72% | +2.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.53% | 19.64% | +2.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.97% | 18.08% | +0.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.87% | 19.18% | +0.69% |
Dividends
CL vs. PG - Dividend Comparison
CL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, less than PG's 2.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 2.30% | 2.61% | 2.18% | 2.40% | 2.36% | 2.10% | 2.05% | 2.48% | 2.79% | 2.11% | 2.37% | 2.25% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.97% | 2.91% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.31% |
Financials
CL vs. PG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Colgate-Palmolive Company and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CL vs. PG - Profitability Comparison
CL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a gross profit of 3.30B and revenue of 5.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.5%.
PG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a gross profit of 10.28B and revenue of 21.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.5%.
CL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported an operating income of 1.02B and revenue of 5.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.0%.
PG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported an operating income of 3.95B and revenue of 21.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.6%.
CL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a net income of 693.00M and revenue of 5.36B, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.
PG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a net income of 3.00B and revenue of 21.20B, resulting in a net margin of 14.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CL and PG have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CL has higher volatility (7.62%) compared to PG (6.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CL dropped -58.91% vs PG's -54.25%.
CL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.52 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CL and PG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer