CL vs. KMB
Compare and contrast key facts about Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB).
Performance
CL vs. KMB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CL vs. KMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 8.52% | -10.98% | 16.57% | 3.78% | -5.44% | 2.08% | 27.17% | 18.60% | -19.19% | 17.88% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | -3.20% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
Fundamentals
CL:
$68.58B
KMB:
$32.13B
CL:
$2.63
KMB:
$6.06
CL:
32.41
KMB:
15.91
CL:
8.37
KMB:
2.75
CL:
3.39
KMB:
1.87
CL:
1.27K
KMB:
19.71
CL:
$20.38B
KMB:
$17.22B
CL:
$12.25B
KMB:
$6.13B
CL:
$3.77B
KMB:
$3.14B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CL achieves a 8.52% return, which is significantly higher than KMB's -3.20% return. Over the past 10 years, CL has outperformed KMB with an annualized return of 4.23%, while KMB has yielded a comparatively lower 0.01% annualized return.
CL
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -14.03%
- YTD
- 8.52%
- 6M
- 7.99%
- 1Y
- -6.80%
- 3Y*
- 6.78%
- 5Y*
- 4.08%
- 10Y*
- 4.23%
KMB
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -12.36%
- YTD
- -3.20%
- 6M
- -20.50%
- 1Y
- -29.15%
- 3Y*
- -6.89%
- 5Y*
- -3.23%
- 10Y*
- 0.01%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CL vs. KMB — Risk / Return Rank
CL
KMB
CL vs. KMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CL | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | -1.17 | +0.85 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.32 | -1.49 | +1.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 0.78 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.29 | -0.92 | +0.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.51 | -1.50 | +0.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CL | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.32 | -1.17 | +0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | -0.16 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | 0.00 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.46 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between CL and KMB is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CL vs. KMB - Dividend Comparison
CL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, less than KMB's 5.25% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 2.44% | 2.61% | 2.18% | 2.40% | 2.36% | 2.10% | 2.05% | 2.48% | 2.79% | 2.11% | 2.37% | 2.25% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 5.25% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
Drawdowns
CL vs. KMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CL drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, which is greater than KMB's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CL and KMB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CL | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.91% | -36.97% | -21.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.74% | -30.70% | +9.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.05% | -31.73% | +2.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.05% | -31.73% | +2.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.85% | -31.64% | +12.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.22% | -8.74% | -2.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.69% | 18.99% | -7.30% |
Volatility
CL vs. KMB - Volatility Comparison
Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) have volatilities of 6.68% and 6.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CL | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.68% | 6.74% | -0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.89% | 21.02% | -5.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.34% | 24.96% | -3.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.30% | 19.79% | -1.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.52% | 20.83% | -1.31% |
Financials
CL vs. KMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Colgate-Palmolive Company and Kimberly-Clark Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CL vs. KMB - Profitability Comparison
CL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a gross profit of 3.15B and revenue of 5.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.2%.
KMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.47B and revenue of 4.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.9%.
CL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported an operating income of 1.08B and revenue of 5.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.6%.
KMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 507.00M and revenue of 4.08B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.4%.
CL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a net income of -37.00M and revenue of 5.23B, resulting in a net margin of -0.7%.
KMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 499.00M and revenue of 4.08B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.