PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CL vs. KMB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CL and KMB is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

CL vs. KMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-4.99%
-3.38%
CL
KMB

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CL:

1.34

KMB:

0.78

Sortino Ratio

CL:

1.88

KMB:

1.13

Omega Ratio

CL:

1.25

KMB:

1.17

Calmar Ratio

CL:

1.22

KMB:

0.82

Martin Ratio

CL:

3.31

KMB:

3.25

Ulcer Index

CL:

6.12%

KMB:

4.29%

Daily Std Dev

CL:

15.12%

KMB:

17.94%

Max Drawdown

CL:

-58.91%

KMB:

-39.69%

Current Drawdown

CL:

-14.63%

KMB:

-9.39%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CL:

$76.38B

KMB:

$43.73B

EPS

CL:

$3.48

KMB:

$7.72

PE Ratio

CL:

26.86

KMB:

16.99

PEG Ratio

CL:

2.11

KMB:

2.73

Total Revenue (TTM)

CL:

$20.11B

KMB:

$20.10B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CL:

$12.12B

KMB:

$7.24B

EBITDA (TTM)

CL:

$5.26B

KMB:

$4.09B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CL achieves a 18.46% return, which is significantly higher than KMB's 12.76% return. Over the past 10 years, CL has outperformed KMB with an annualized return of 5.12%, while KMB has yielded a comparatively lower 4.54% annualized return.


CL

YTD

18.46%

1M

-2.67%

6M

-5.45%

1Y

20.29%

5Y*

8.68%

10Y*

5.12%

KMB

YTD

12.76%

1M

-3.66%

6M

-2.86%

1Y

13.98%

5Y*

2.74%

10Y*

4.54%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CL vs. KMB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CL, currently valued at 1.34, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.340.78
The chart of Sortino ratio for CL, currently valued at 1.88, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.881.13
The chart of Omega ratio for CL, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.251.17
The chart of Calmar ratio for CL, currently valued at 1.22, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.220.82
The chart of Martin ratio for CL, currently valued at 3.31, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.003.313.25
CL
KMB

The current CL Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is higher than the KMB Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CL and KMB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1.34
0.78
CL
KMB

Dividends

CL vs. KMB - Dividend Comparison

CL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, less than KMB's 3.69% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CL
Colgate-Palmolive Company
2.14%2.40%2.36%2.10%2.05%2.48%2.79%2.11%2.37%2.25%2.05%2.04%
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
3.69%3.88%3.42%3.19%3.17%3.00%3.51%3.22%3.22%2.77%0.73%0.00%

Drawdowns

CL vs. KMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CL drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, which is greater than KMB's maximum drawdown of -39.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CL and KMB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-14.63%
-9.39%
CL
KMB

Volatility

CL vs. KMB - Volatility Comparison

Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) has a higher volatility of 4.26% compared to Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) at 3.88%. This indicates that CL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
4.26%
3.88%
CL
KMB

Financials

CL vs. KMB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Colgate-Palmolive Company and Kimberly-Clark Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab