CL vs. KMB
Compare and contrast key facts about Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CL or KMB.
Key characteristics
| CL | KMB | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 27.40% | 21.93% |
| 1Y Return | 38.60% | 21.54% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 12.31% | 6.54% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 10.79% | 4.98% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 6.76% | 6.37% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.72 | 1.22 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.75 | 1.69 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.49 | 1.25 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.42 | 1.16 |
| Martin Ratio | 15.37 | 8.59 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.58% | 2.54% |
| Daily Std Dev | 14.58% | 17.87% |
| Max Drawdown | -49.51% | -39.38% |
| Current Drawdown | -8.19% | -2.02% |
Fundamentals
| CL | KMB | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $82.14B | $49.20B |
| EPS | $3.43 | $6.76 |
| PE Ratio | 29.31 | 21.61 |
| PEG Ratio | 2.32 | 1.59 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $15.07B | $15.15B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $9.05B | $5.46B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $3.91B | $2.86B |
Correlation
The correlation between CL and KMB is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CL vs. KMB - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CL achieves a 27.40% return, which is significantly higher than KMB's 21.93% return. Over the past 10 years, CL has outperformed KMB with an annualized return of 6.76%, while KMB has yielded a comparatively lower 6.37% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CL vs. KMB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CL vs. KMB - Dividend Comparison
CL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, less than KMB's 3.36% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 1.99% | 2.40% | 2.36% | 2.10% | 2.05% | 2.48% | 2.79% | 2.11% | 2.37% | 2.25% | 2.05% | 2.04% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 3.36% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% | 0.73% | 0.01% |
Drawdowns
CL vs. KMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CL drawdown since its inception was -49.51%, which is greater than KMB's maximum drawdown of -39.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CL and KMB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CL vs. KMB - Volatility Comparison
Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) at 2.89%. This indicates that CL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CL vs. KMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Colgate-Palmolive Company and Kimberly-Clark Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities