PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAIC vs. NOC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SAIC vs. NOC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) and Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAIC achieves a 17.58% return, which is significantly higher than NOC's -4.14% return. Over the past 10 years, SAIC has underperformed NOC with an annualized return of 8.61%, while NOC has yielded a comparatively higher 11.28% annualized return.


SAIC

1D
1.22%
1M
5.90%
6M
15.93%
YTD
17.58%
1Y
7.29%
3Y*
-0.17%
5Y*
7.55%
10Y*
8.61%
ALL TIME*
12.65%

NOC

1D
1.43%
1M
-1.19%
6M
-21.04%
YTD
-4.14%
1Y
-6.05%
3Y*
8.36%
5Y*
10.13%
10Y*
11.28%
ALL TIME*
12.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$545.76M$521.87M$523.59M
$51.45M$49.80M$59.89M

SAIC vs. NOC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SAIC
Science Applications International Corporation
17.58%-8.73%-9.04%13.58%34.95%-10.20%10.81%39.15%-15.48%-8.18%
NOC
Northrop Grumman Corporation
-4.14%23.61%1.93%-12.79%43.02%29.29%-9.92%42.69%-18.95%33.88%

Correlation

The correlation between SAIC and NOC is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2013

0.40

The correlation between SAIC and NOC shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (3 years) to 0.42 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SAIC:

$4.95B

NOC:

$77.07B

EPS

SAIC:

$8.91

NOC:

$31.48

PE Ratio

SAIC:

13.14

NOC:

17.23

PEG Ratio

SAIC:

0.80

NOC:

2.54

PS Ratio

SAIC:

0.73

NOC:

1.81

PB Ratio

SAIC:

3.62

NOC:

4.32

Total Revenue (TTM)

SAIC:

$7.29B

NOC:

$42.89B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SAIC:

$912.00M

NOC:

$8.60B

EBITDA (TTM)

SAIC:

$691.00M

NOC:

$6.84B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAIC vs. NOC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SAIC
SAIC Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
SAIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAIC Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SAIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAIC Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

NOC
NOC Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
NOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOC Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
NOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOC Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SAIC vs. NOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) and Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SAICNOCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

0.99

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.21

-0.13

+0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.39

-0.27

+0.65

SAIC vs. NOC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAIC Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is higher than the NOC Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAIC and NOC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SAIC vs. NOC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAIC drawdown since its inception was -45.92%, smaller than the maximum NOC drawdown of -71.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAIC and NOC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAICNOCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.92%

-71.12%

+25.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.34%

-35.13%

+3.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.74%

-35.13%

-10.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.74%

-35.13%

-10.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.92%

-36.38%

-9.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.15%

-29.06%

+6.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.73%

-18.44%

+5.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.10%

16.55%

+0.55%

Volatility

SAIC vs. NOC - Volatility Comparison

Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) has a higher volatility of 9.44% compared to Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) at 8.69%. This indicates that SAIC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAICNOCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.44%

8.69%

+0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.67%

20.69%

+9.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.96%

26.15%

+13.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.48%

25.67%

+4.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.71%

25.65%

+7.06%

Dividends

SAIC vs. NOC - Dividend Comparison

SAIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than NOC's 1.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOC
Northrop Grumman Corporation
1.73%1.58%1.72%1.57%1.24%1.59%1.86%1.50%1.92%1.27%1.50%1.64%
SAIC
Science Applications International Corporation
1.26%1.47%1.32%1.19%1.33%1.77%1.56%1.63%1.95%1.62%1.46%2.58%

Financials

SAIC vs. NOC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Science Applications International Corporation and Northrop Grumman Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

SAIC vs. NOC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Science Applications International Corporation and Northrop Grumman Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

SAIC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Science Applications International Corporation reported a gross profit of 249.00M and revenue of 1.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.1%.

NOC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Northrop Grumman Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.12B and revenue of 10.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.5%.

SAIC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Science Applications International Corporation reported an operating income of 179.00M and revenue of 1.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.

NOC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Northrop Grumman Corporation reported an operating income of 1.10B and revenue of 10.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.1%.

SAIC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Science Applications International Corporation reported a net income of 115.00M and revenue of 1.91B, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.

NOC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Northrop Grumman Corporation reported a net income of 1.09B and revenue of 10.88B, resulting in a net margin of 10.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SAIC and NOC have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SAIC has higher volatility (9.44%) compared to NOC (8.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAIC dropped -45.92% vs NOC's -71.12%.

SAIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.17 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAIC and NOC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer