PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CL vs. PEP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

CL vs. PEP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) and PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.77%
-7.57%
CL
PEP

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CL achieves a 21.71% return, which is significantly higher than PEP's -2.39% return. Over the past 10 years, CL has underperformed PEP with an annualized return of 5.79%, while PEP has yielded a comparatively higher 8.15% annualized return.


CL

YTD

21.71%

1M

-4.10%

6M

2.77%

1Y

25.53%

5Y (annualized)

9.87%

10Y (annualized)

5.79%

PEP

YTD

-2.39%

1M

-6.33%

6M

-7.57%

1Y

-1.29%

5Y (annualized)

6.87%

10Y (annualized)

8.15%

Fundamentals


CLPEP
Market Cap$76.73B$217.79B
EPS$3.48$6.78
PE Ratio26.9923.41
PEG Ratio2.111.89
Total Revenue (TTM)$20.11B$91.92B
Gross Profit (TTM)$12.12B$50.43B
EBITDA (TTM)$5.26B$16.26B

Key characteristics


CLPEP
Sharpe Ratio1.65-0.08
Sortino Ratio2.230.00
Omega Ratio1.311.00
Calmar Ratio1.53-0.08
Martin Ratio5.29-0.25
Ulcer Index4.83%5.13%
Daily Std Dev15.48%16.40%
Max Drawdown-58.91%-40.41%
Current Drawdown-12.30%-13.63%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between CL and PEP is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CL vs. PEP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) and PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CL, currently valued at 1.65, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.65-0.08
The chart of Sortino ratio for CL, currently valued at 2.23, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.230.00
The chart of Omega ratio for CL, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.311.00
The chart of Calmar ratio for CL, currently valued at 1.53, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.53-0.08
The chart of Martin ratio for CL, currently valued at 5.29, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.005.29-0.25
CL
PEP

The current CL Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the PEP Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CL and PEP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.65
-0.08
CL
PEP

Dividends

CL vs. PEP - Dividend Comparison

CL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, less than PEP's 3.25% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CL
Colgate-Palmolive Company
2.09%2.40%2.36%2.10%2.05%2.48%2.79%2.11%2.37%2.25%2.05%2.04%
PEP
PepsiCo, Inc.
3.25%2.92%2.51%2.45%2.71%2.78%3.25%2.64%2.83%2.76%2.68%2.70%

Drawdowns

CL vs. PEP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CL drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, which is greater than PEP's maximum drawdown of -40.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CL and PEP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-12.30%
-13.63%
CL
PEP

Volatility

CL vs. PEP - Volatility Comparison

Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) has a higher volatility of 7.42% compared to PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) at 5.51%. This indicates that CL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
7.42%
5.51%
CL
PEP

Financials

CL vs. PEP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Colgate-Palmolive Company and PepsiCo, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items