CL vs. PEP

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) and PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP).

Performance

CL vs. PEP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) and PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CL vs. PEP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company	8.52%	-10.98%	16.57%	3.78%	-5.44%	2.08%	27.17%	18.60%	-19.19%	17.88%
PEP PepsiCo, Inc.	9.17%	-1.85%	-7.60%	-3.29%	6.78%	20.56%	11.67%	27.38%	-4.81%	17.82%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CL : $68.58B PEP : $212.90B
EPS CL : $2.63 PEP : $6.00
PE Ratio CL : 32.41 PEP : 25.86
PEG Ratio CL : 8.37 PEP : 9.18
PS Ratio CL : 3.39 PEP : 2.27
PB Ratio CL : 1.27K PEP : 10.43
Total Revenue (TTM) CL : $20.38B PEP : $93.93B
Gross Profit (TTM) CL : $12.25B PEP : $50.86B
EBITDA (TTM) CL : $3.77B PEP : $14.39B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CL achieves a 8.52% return, which is significantly lower than PEP's 9.17% return. Over the past 10 years, CL has underperformed PEP with an annualized return of 4.23%, while PEP has yielded a comparatively higher 7.32% annualized return.

CL

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: -14.03%
• YTD: 8.52%
• 6M: 7.99%
• 1Y: -6.80%
• 3Y*: 6.78%
• 5Y*: 4.08%
• 10Y*: 4.23%

PEP

• 1D: -0.98%
• 1M: -7.70%
• YTD: 9.17%
• 6M: 12.65%
• 1Y: 7.72%
• 3Y*: -1.95%
• 5Y*: 5.12%
• 10Y*: 7.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CL vs. PEP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CL

CL Risk / Return Rank: 29
CL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
CL Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
CL Omega Ratio Rank: 25
CL Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
CL Martin Ratio Rank: 34

PEP

PEP Risk / Return Rank: 52
PEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
PEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
PEP Omega Ratio Rank: 45
PEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
PEP Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CL vs. PEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) and PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CL	PEP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.32	0.35	-0.67
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.32	0.70	-1.02
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.08	-0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.29	0.54	-0.83
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.51	1.11	-1.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CL vs. PEP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CL Sharpe Ratio is -0.32, which is lower than the PEP Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CL and PEP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CL	PEP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.32	0.35	-0.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22	0.28	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.22	0.38	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	0.39	+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between CL and PEP is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CL vs. PEP - Dividend Comparison

CL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, less than PEP's 3.66% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company	2.44%	2.61%	2.18%	2.40%	2.36%	2.10%	2.05%	2.48%	2.79%	2.11%	2.37%	2.25%
PEP PepsiCo, Inc.	3.66%	3.92%	3.51%	2.91%	2.50%	2.45%	2.71%	2.77%	3.25%	2.64%	2.83%	2.76%

Drawdowns

CL vs. PEP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CL drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, smaller than the maximum PEP drawdown of -73.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CL and PEP.

Drawdown Indicators

	CL	PEP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.91%	-73.92%	+15.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.74%	-15.14%	-5.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.05%	-30.32%	+1.27%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.05%	-30.32%	+1.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.85%	-12.39%	-6.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.22%	-13.64%	+2.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.69%	7.37%	+4.32%

Volatility

CL vs. PEP - Volatility Comparison

Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) has a higher volatility of 6.68% compared to PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) at 5.35%. This indicates that CL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CL	PEP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.68%	5.35%	+1.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.89%	14.83%	+1.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.34%	22.46%	-1.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.30%	18.11%	+0.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.52%	19.55%	-0.03%

Financials

CL vs. PEP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Colgate-Palmolive Company and PepsiCo, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a gross profit of 3.15B and revenue of 5.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.2%.

PEP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PepsiCo, Inc. reported a gross profit of 15.62B and revenue of 29.34B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.2%.

CL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported an operating income of 1.08B and revenue of 5.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.6%.

PEP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PepsiCo, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.56B and revenue of 29.34B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.1%.

CL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a net income of -37.00M and revenue of 5.23B, resulting in a net margin of -0.7%.

PEP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PepsiCo, Inc. reported a net income of 2.54B and revenue of 29.34B, resulting in a net margin of 8.7%.