PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CL vs. CAT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CL and CAT is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.3

Performance

CL vs. CAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) and Caterpillar Inc. (CAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

10,000.00%15,000.00%20,000.00%25,000.00%30,000.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
26,266.97%
9,294.49%
CL
CAT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CL:

0.40

CAT:

-0.24

Sortino Ratio

CL:

0.66

CAT:

-0.17

Omega Ratio

CL:

1.09

CAT:

0.98

Calmar Ratio

CL:

0.36

CAT:

-0.31

Martin Ratio

CL:

0.69

CAT:

-0.62

Ulcer Index

CL:

10.54%

CAT:

10.61%

Daily Std Dev

CL:

18.51%

CAT:

27.17%

Max Drawdown

CL:

-58.91%

CAT:

-73.43%

Current Drawdown

CL:

-13.07%

CAT:

-19.43%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CL:

$75.88B

CAT:

$159.94B

EPS

CL:

$3.51

CAT:

$22.05

PE Ratio

CL:

26.65

CAT:

15.18

PEG Ratio

CL:

2.02

CAT:

1.61

Total Revenue (TTM)

CL:

$15.04B

CAT:

$49.01B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CL:

$9.13B

CAT:

$17.50B

EBITDA (TTM)

CL:

$3.66B

CAT:

$12.23B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CL achieves a 3.49% return, which is significantly higher than CAT's -7.41% return. Over the past 10 years, CL has underperformed CAT with an annualized return of 5.49%, while CAT has yielded a comparatively higher 18.46% annualized return.


CL

YTD

3.49%

1M

0.80%

6M

-7.36%

1Y

7.33%

5Y*

9.27%

10Y*

5.49%

CAT

YTD

-7.41%

1M

0.79%

6M

-14.45%

1Y

-6.89%

5Y*

26.67%

10Y*

18.46%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CL vs. CAT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CL is 6262
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CL is 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CL is 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CL is 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CL is 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CL is 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

CAT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CAT is 3636
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CAT is 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CAT is 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CAT is 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CAT is 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CAT is 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CL vs. CAT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) and Caterpillar Inc. (CAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CL, currently valued at 0.40, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
CL: 0.40
CAT: -0.24
The chart of Sortino ratio for CL, currently valued at 0.66, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
CL: 0.66
CAT: -0.17
The chart of Omega ratio for CL, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
CL: 1.09
CAT: 0.98
The chart of Calmar ratio for CL, currently valued at 0.36, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
CL: 0.36
CAT: -0.31
The chart of Martin ratio for CL, currently valued at 0.69, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
CL: 0.69
CAT: -0.62

The current CL Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is higher than the CAT Sharpe Ratio of -0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CL and CAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.40
-0.24
CL
CAT

Dividends

CL vs. CAT - Dividend Comparison

CL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, more than CAT's 1.65% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CL
Colgate-Palmolive Company
2.14%2.18%2.40%2.36%2.10%2.05%2.48%2.79%2.11%2.37%2.25%2.05%
CAT
Caterpillar Inc.
1.65%1.49%1.69%1.93%2.07%2.26%2.56%2.58%1.97%3.32%4.33%2.84%

Drawdowns

CL vs. CAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CL drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, smaller than the maximum CAT drawdown of -73.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CL and CAT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-13.07%
-19.43%
CL
CAT

Volatility

CL vs. CAT - Volatility Comparison

Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) has a higher volatility of 7.89% compared to Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) at 7.14%. This indicates that CL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
7.89%
7.14%
CL
CAT

Financials

CL vs. CAT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Colgate-Palmolive Company and Caterpillar Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab