PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CL vs. CAT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CLCAT
YTD Return15.52%17.10%
1Y Return19.70%63.18%
3Y Return (Ann)7.61%16.67%
5Y Return (Ann)7.55%22.69%
10Y Return (Ann)5.55%15.69%
Sharpe Ratio1.512.26
Daily Std Dev14.32%27.29%
Max Drawdown-67.62%-73.43%
Current Drawdown0.00%-9.14%

Fundamentals


CLCAT
Market Cap$74.81B$171.48B
EPS$2.77$22.11
PE Ratio32.8615.53
PEG Ratio2.152.10
Revenue (TTM)$19.75B$67.00B
Gross Profit (TTM)$10.25B$15.57B
EBITDA (TTM)$4.70B$16.56B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between CL and CAT is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CL vs. CAT - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CL achieves a 15.52% return, which is significantly lower than CAT's 17.10% return. Over the past 10 years, CL has underperformed CAT with an annualized return of 5.55%, while CAT has yielded a comparatively higher 15.69% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


8,000.00%10,000.00%12,000.00%14,000.00%16,000.00%18,000.00%20,000.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
9,528.65%
18,260.60%
CL
CAT

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Colgate-Palmolive Company

Caterpillar Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CL vs. CAT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) and Caterpillar Inc. (CAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CL
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CL, currently valued at 1.51, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.51
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CL, currently valued at 2.11, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.11
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CL, currently valued at 1.27, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.27
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CL, currently valued at 1.37, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.37
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CL, currently valued at 3.33, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.003.33
CAT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CAT, currently valued at 2.26, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.002.26
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CAT, currently valued at 3.06, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.06
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CAT, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.40
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CAT, currently valued at 2.83, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.83
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CAT, currently valued at 9.68, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.009.68

CL vs. CAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CL Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the CAT Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of CL and CAT.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
1.51
2.26
CL
CAT

Dividends

CL vs. CAT - Dividend Comparison

CL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, more than CAT's 1.51% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CL
Colgate-Palmolive Company
2.13%2.40%2.36%2.10%2.05%2.48%2.79%2.11%2.37%2.25%2.05%2.04%
CAT
Caterpillar Inc.
1.51%1.69%1.93%2.07%2.26%2.56%2.58%1.97%3.32%4.33%2.84%1.89%

Drawdowns

CL vs. CAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CL drawdown since its inception was -67.62%, smaller than the maximum CAT drawdown of -73.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CL and CAT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril0
-9.14%
CL
CAT

Volatility

CL vs. CAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) is 3.68%, while Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) has a volatility of 9.35%. This indicates that CL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
3.68%
9.35%
CL
CAT

Financials

CL vs. CAT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Colgate-Palmolive Company and Caterpillar Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items