PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SAIC vs. COST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


SAICCOST
YTD Return20.45%42.28%
1Y Return28.88%62.58%
3Y Return (Ann)20.05%23.57%
5Y Return (Ann)14.19%27.42%
10Y Return (Ann)13.40%23.65%
Sharpe Ratio1.163.37
Sortino Ratio1.613.99
Omega Ratio1.281.60
Calmar Ratio1.526.44
Martin Ratio3.2816.64
Ulcer Index9.65%3.97%
Daily Std Dev27.18%19.61%
Max Drawdown-45.92%-53.39%
Current Drawdown-3.95%-1.07%

Fundamentals


SAICCOST
Market Cap$7.59B$413.11B
EPS$5.60$16.61
PE Ratio27.3856.13
PEG Ratio3.675.66
Total Revenue (TTM)$5.40B$254.45B
Gross Profit (TTM)$615.00M$32.10B
EBITDA (TTM)$196.00M$10.63B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between SAIC and COST is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

SAIC vs. COST - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, SAIC achieves a 20.45% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 42.28% return. Over the past 10 years, SAIC has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 13.40%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 23.65% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
9.61%
18.96%
SAIC
COST

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SAIC vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SAIC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SAIC, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.16
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SAIC, currently valued at 1.61, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.61
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SAIC, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.28
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SAIC, currently valued at 1.52, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.52
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SAIC, currently valued at 3.28, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.003.28
COST
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for COST, currently valued at 3.37, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.37
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for COST, currently valued at 3.99, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.99
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for COST, currently valued at 1.60, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.60
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for COST, currently valued at 6.44, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.006.44
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for COST, currently valued at 16.64, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0016.64

SAIC vs. COST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAIC Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the COST Sharpe Ratio of 3.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAIC and COST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.16
3.37
SAIC
COST

Dividends

SAIC vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

SAIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than COST's 2.09% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
SAIC
Science Applications International Corporation
1.00%1.19%1.33%1.77%1.56%1.63%1.95%1.62%1.46%2.58%2.26%0.85%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
2.09%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%0.97%1.01%

Drawdowns

SAIC vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAIC drawdown since its inception was -45.92%, smaller than the maximum COST drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAIC and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-3.95%
-1.07%
SAIC
COST

Volatility

SAIC vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) has a higher volatility of 5.65% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 4.55%. This indicates that SAIC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.65%
4.55%
SAIC
COST

Financials

SAIC vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Science Applications International Corporation and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items