SAIC vs. HWM
SAIC (Science Applications International Corporation) and HWM (Howmet Aerospace Inc.) are both stocks. SAIC operates in Information Technology Services (Technology), while HWM operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, SAIC returned 7.60%/yr vs 33.65%/yr for HWM. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SAIC vs. HWM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAIC achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly lower than HWM's 36.89% return. Over the past 10 years, SAIC has underperformed HWM with an annualized return of 7.60%, while HWM has yielded a comparatively higher 33.65% annualized return.
SAIC
- 1D
- -1.75%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 0.66%
- 6M
- -1.45%
- 1Y
- -1.56%
- 3Y*
- -0.88%
- 5Y*
- 3.42%
- 10Y*
- 7.60%
HWM
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 9.28%
- YTD
- 36.89%
- 6M
- 34.81%
- 1Y
- 62.11%
- 3Y*
- 82.73%
- 5Y*
- 53.11%
- 10Y*
- 33.65%
SAIC vs. HWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAIC Science Applications International Corporation | 0.66% | -8.73% | -9.04% | 13.58% | 34.95% | -10.20% | 10.81% | 39.15% | -15.48% | -8.18% |
HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc. | 36.89% | 87.95% | 102.71% | 37.84% | 24.16% | 11.67% | 21.03% | 83.54% | -37.43% | 48.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between SAIC and HWM is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2013 | 0.31 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SAIC and HWM has dropped to 0.00 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
SAIC:
$4.43B
HWM:
$112.99B
SAIC:
$8.85
HWM:
$4.31
SAIC:
11.37
HWM:
65.07
SAIC:
0.69
HWM:
1.10
SAIC:
0.63
HWM:
13.16
SAIC:
3.11
HWM:
20.46
SAIC:
$7.29B
HWM:
$8.62B
SAIC:
$912.00M
HWM:
$2.81B
SAIC:
$691.00M
HWM:
$2.66B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SAIC vs. HWM — Risk / Return Rank
SAIC
HWM
SAIC vs. HWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) and Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SAIC | HWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.32 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.05 | 3.93 | -3.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.09 | 11.10 | -11.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SAIC vs. HWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAIC drawdown since its inception was -45.92%, smaller than the maximum HWM drawdown of -88.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAIC and HWM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAIC | HWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.92% | -88.30% | +42.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.34% | -15.89% | -15.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.74% | -19.41% | -26.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.74% | -21.22% | -24.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.92% | -64.81% | +18.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.35% | -1.01% | -32.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.63% | -31.00% | +18.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.03% | 5.61% | +11.42% |
Volatility
SAIC vs. HWM - Volatility Comparison
Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) has a higher volatility of 13.46% compared to Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) at 10.24%. This indicates that SAIC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SAIC | HWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.46% | 10.24% | +3.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.22% | 25.16% | +5.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.57% | 31.74% | +6.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.09% | 32.21% | -2.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.56% | 39.83% | -7.27% |
Dividends
SAIC vs. HWM - Dividend Comparison
SAIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, more than HWM's 0.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc. | 0.17% | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.31% | 0.25% | 0.13% | 0.05% | 0.39% | 1.42% | 0.88% | 40.49% | 1.22% |
SAIC Science Applications International Corporation | 1.47% | 1.47% | 1.32% | 1.19% | 1.33% | 1.77% | 1.56% | 1.63% | 1.95% | 1.62% | 1.46% | 2.58% |
Financials
SAIC vs. HWM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Science Applications International Corporation and Howmet Aerospace Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SAIC vs. HWM - Profitability Comparison
SAIC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Science Applications International Corporation reported a gross profit of 249.00M and revenue of 1.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.1%.
HWM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported a gross profit of 854.00M and revenue of 2.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
SAIC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Science Applications International Corporation reported an operating income of 179.00M and revenue of 1.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.
HWM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported an operating income of 734.00M and revenue of 2.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.7%.
SAIC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Science Applications International Corporation reported a net income of 115.00M and revenue of 1.91B, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.
HWM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported a net income of 580.00M and revenue of 2.31B, resulting in a net margin of 25.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SAIC and HWM have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SAIC has higher volatility (13.46%) compared to HWM (10.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAIC dropped -45.92% vs HWM's -88.30%.
HWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SAIC and HWM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer