PortfoliosLab logo
SAIC vs. HWM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between SAIC and HWM is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

SAIC vs. HWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) and Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SAIC:

-0.36

HWM:

2.68

Sortino Ratio

SAIC:

-0.32

HWM:

3.26

Omega Ratio

SAIC:

0.95

HWM:

1.46

Calmar Ratio

SAIC:

-0.36

HWM:

5.14

Martin Ratio

SAIC:

-0.67

HWM:

19.34

Ulcer Index

SAIC:

20.11%

HWM:

5.16%

Daily Std Dev

SAIC:

33.78%

HWM:

38.58%

Max Drawdown

SAIC:

-45.92%

HWM:

-64.81%

Current Drawdown

SAIC:

-24.54%

HWM:

-0.25%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SAIC:

$5.45B

HWM:

$68.66B

EPS

SAIC:

$7.18

HWM:

$3.06

PE Ratio

SAIC:

16.09

HWM:

55.52

PEG Ratio

SAIC:

3.67

HWM:

0.80

PS Ratio

SAIC:

0.73

HWM:

9.10

PB Ratio

SAIC:

3.46

HWM:

14.49

Total Revenue (TTM)

SAIC:

$5.63B

HWM:

$7.55B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SAIC:

$679.00M

HWM:

$2.30B

EBITDA (TTM)

SAIC:

$530.00M

HWM:

$1.98B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAIC achieves a 4.03% return, which is significantly lower than HWM's 55.55% return.


SAIC

YTD

4.03%

1M

-3.24%

6M

-6.41%

1Y

-13.13%

3Y*

11.57%

5Y*

7.17%

10Y*

10.01%

HWM

YTD

55.55%

1M

14.84%

6M

43.72%

1Y

101.30%

3Y*

68.65%

5Y*

67.41%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Howmet Aerospace Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

SAIC vs. HWM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAIC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SAIC is 2929
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SAIC is 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SAIC is 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SAIC is 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SAIC is 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SAIC is 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

HWM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HWM is 9797
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HWM is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HWM is 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HWM is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HWM is 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HWM is 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SAIC vs. HWM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) and Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current SAIC Sharpe Ratio is -0.36, which is lower than the HWM Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAIC and HWM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

SAIC vs. HWM - Dividend Comparison

SAIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, more than HWM's 0.21% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
SAIC
Science Applications International Corporation
1.28%1.32%1.19%1.33%1.77%1.56%1.63%1.95%1.62%1.46%2.58%2.26%
HWM
Howmet Aerospace Inc.
0.21%0.24%0.31%0.25%0.13%0.05%0.39%1.42%0.88%0.49%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SAIC vs. HWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAIC drawdown since its inception was -45.92%, smaller than the maximum HWM drawdown of -64.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAIC and HWM.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

SAIC vs. HWM - Volatility Comparison

Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) and Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) have volatilities of 8.07% and 8.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

SAIC vs. HWM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Science Applications International Corporation and Howmet Aerospace Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.20B1.40B1.60B1.80B2.00BJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
1.84B
1.94B
(SAIC) Total Revenue
(HWM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SAIC vs. HWM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Science Applications International Corporation and Howmet Aerospace Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%JulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
12.6%
33.6%
(SAIC) Gross Margin
(HWM) Gross Margin
SAIC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Science Applications International Corporation reported a gross profit of 232.00M and revenue of 1.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.6%.

HWM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported a gross profit of 652.00M and revenue of 1.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.6%.

SAIC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Science Applications International Corporation reported an operating income of 138.00M and revenue of 1.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.5%.

HWM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported an operating income of 494.00M and revenue of 1.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.4%.

SAIC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Science Applications International Corporation reported a net income of 98.00M and revenue of 1.84B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.

HWM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported a net income of 344.00M and revenue of 1.94B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.