PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIFG vs. HOOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CIFG vs. HOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIFG achieves a 96.56% return, which is significantly higher than HOOG's -40.69% return.


CIFG

1D
-3.87%
1M
42.24%
YTD
96.56%
6M
67.07%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HOOG

1D
-4.87%
1M
83.12%
YTD
-40.69%
6M
-48.04%
1Y
-5.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIFG vs. HOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CIFG and HOOG is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025

0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIFG vs. HOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIFG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


HOOG
HOOG Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
HOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIFG vs. HOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CIFGHOOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.09

CIFG vs. HOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CIFG vs. HOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIFG drawdown since its inception was -71.71%, smaller than the maximum HOOG drawdown of -86.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFG and HOOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIFGHOOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.71%

-86.94%

+15.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-86.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.44%

-72.34%

+61.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.54%

-39.04%

+3.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

55.98%

Volatility

CIFG vs. HOOG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIFGHOOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

46.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

101.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

205.93%

139.38%

+66.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

205.93%

144.74%

+61.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

205.93%

144.74%

+61.19%

CIFG vs. HOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CIFG and HOOG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

CIFG vs. HOOG - Dividend Comparison

CIFG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.75%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CIFG and HOOG have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CIFG and HOOG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

HOOG has the higher dividend yield at 20.75%, compared with 0.00% for CIFG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIFG and HOOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer