CIFG vs. BEG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CIFG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF) and BEG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

CIFG vs. BEG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF (BEG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIFG achieves a 92.34% return, which is significantly lower than BEG's 552.25% return.

CIFG

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: 94.51%
• YTD: 92.34%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BEG

• 1D: -9.38%
• 1M: -7.23%
• YTD: 552.25%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIFG vs. BEG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CIFG Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF	92.34%	-4.73%
BEG Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF	552.25%	-5.55%

Correlation

The correlation between CIFG and BEG is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2025	0.58

Return for Risk

CIFG vs. BEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF (BEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CIFG	BEG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.12	24.77	-24.65

Drawdowns

CIFG vs. BEG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIFG drawdown since its inception was -71.71%, which is greater than BEG's maximum drawdown of -59.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFG and BEG.

Drawdown Indicators

	CIFG	BEG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.71%	-59.85%	-11.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.35%	-13.90%	+13.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.01%	-16.14%	-21.87%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CIFG	BEG	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	203.83%	213.85%	-10.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	203.83%	213.85%	-10.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	203.83%	213.85%	-10.02%

CIFG vs. BEG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CIFG and BEG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

CIFG vs. BEG - Dividend Comparison

Neither CIFG nor BEG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CIFG and BEG in my portfolio?

CIFG and BEG have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CIFG or BEG?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CIFG or BEG?

CIFG and BEG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CIFG or BEG?

CIFG and BEG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.