CIFG vs. HUTG

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

CIFG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF) and HUTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long HUT Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. CIFG is actively managed, while HUTG is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

CIFG vs. HUTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HUT Daily ETF (HUTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CIFG

• 1D: -6.83%
• 1M: 47.97%
• YTD: 104.47%
• 6M: 64.97%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HUTG

• 1D: -5.21%
• 1M: 22.32%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIFG vs. HUTG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CIFG Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF	48.27%
HUTG Leverage Shares 2X Long HUT Daily ETF	118.79%

Correlation

The correlation between CIFG and HUTG is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026	0.83

Return for Risk

CIFG vs. HUTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HUT Daily ETF (HUTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

CIFG vs. HUTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIFG drawdown since its inception was -71.71%, which is greater than HUTG's maximum drawdown of -66.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFG and HUTG.

Drawdown Indicators

	CIFG	HUTG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.71%	-66.30%	-5.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.83%	-21.66%	+14.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.73%	-26.49%	-9.24%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CIFG	HUTG	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	206.60%	216.26%	-9.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	206.60%	216.26%	-9.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	206.60%	216.26%	-9.66%

CIFG vs. HUTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CIFG and HUTG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

CIFG vs. HUTG - Dividend Comparison

Neither CIFG nor HUTG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CIFG and HUTG in my portfolio?

CIFG and HUTG have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CIFG or HUTG?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CIFG or HUTG?

CIFG and HUTG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CIFG or HUTG?

CIFG and HUTG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.