PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIFG vs. CIFU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CIFG vs. CIFU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG) and T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CIFG having a 92.34% return and CIFU slightly lower at 90.91%.


CIFG

1D
-0.35%
1M
94.51%
YTD
92.34%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CIFU

1D
0.89%
1M
94.18%
YTD
90.91%
6M
10.06%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIFG vs. CIFU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CIFG and CIFU is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025

1.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIFG vs. CIFU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG) and T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CIFG vs. CIFU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CIFGCIFUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.99

-0.87

Drawdowns

CIFG vs. CIFU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIFG drawdown since its inception was -71.71%, smaller than the maximum CIFU drawdown of -77.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFG and CIFU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIFGCIFUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.71%

-77.20%

+5.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-9.09%

+8.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.01%

-45.35%

+7.34%

Volatility

CIFG vs. CIFU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIFGCIFUDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

203.83%

206.19%

-2.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

203.83%

206.19%

-2.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

203.83%

206.19%

-2.36%

CIFG vs. CIFU - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIFG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than CIFU's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

CIFG vs. CIFU - Dividend Comparison

Neither CIFG nor CIFU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, CIFG and CIFU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, CIFG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CIFG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CIFU.

CIFG and CIFU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CIFG and 1.50% for CIFU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIFG and CIFU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer