CIFG vs. NBIL
CIFG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF) and NBIL (GraniteShares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CIFG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for NBIL.
Performance
CIFG vs. NBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIFG achieves a 104.47% return, which is significantly lower than NBIL's 579.43% return.
CIFG
- 1D
- -6.83%
- 1M
- 47.97%
- YTD
- 104.47%
- 6M
- 64.97%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NBIL
- 1D
- -2.71%
- 1M
- 61.75%
- YTD
- 579.43%
- 6M
- 446.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIFG vs. NBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CIFG Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF | 104.47% | -32.52% |
NBIL GraniteShares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 579.43% | -23.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIFG and NBIL is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.61 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIFG vs. NBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG) and GraniteShares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CIFG vs. NBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIFG drawdown since its inception was -71.71%, smaller than the maximum NBIL drawdown of -77.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFG and NBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIFG | NBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.71% | -77.87% | +6.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.83% | -2.71% | -4.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.73% | -42.91% | +7.18% |
Volatility
CIFG vs. NBIL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIFG | NBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 206.60% | 199.00% | +7.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 206.60% | 199.00% | +7.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 206.60% | 199.00% | +7.60% |
CIFG vs. NBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIFG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than NBIL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
CIFG vs. NBIL - Dividend Comparison
Neither CIFG nor NBIL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CIFG and NBIL have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CIFG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CIFG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for NBIL.
CIFG and NBIL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CIFG and 1.50% for NBIL.
Find the right allocation for CIFG and NBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer