PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIFG vs. NBIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CIFG vs. NBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG) and GraniteShares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIFG achieves a 104.47% return, which is significantly lower than NBIL's 579.43% return.


CIFG

1D
-6.83%
1M
47.97%
YTD
104.47%
6M
64.97%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NBIL

1D
-2.71%
1M
61.75%
YTD
579.43%
6M
446.11%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIFG vs. NBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CIFG
Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF
104.47%-32.52%
NBIL
GraniteShares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF
579.43%-23.57%

Correlation

The correlation between CIFG and NBIL is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025

0.61

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIFG vs. NBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG) and GraniteShares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CIFG vs. NBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CIFG vs. NBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIFG drawdown since its inception was -71.71%, smaller than the maximum NBIL drawdown of -77.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFG and NBIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIFGNBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.71%

-77.87%

+6.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.83%

-2.71%

-4.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.73%

-42.91%

+7.18%

Volatility

CIFG vs. NBIL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIFGNBILDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

206.60%

199.00%

+7.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

206.60%

199.00%

+7.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

206.60%

199.00%

+7.60%

CIFG vs. NBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIFG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than NBIL's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

CIFG vs. NBIL - Dividend Comparison

Neither CIFG nor NBIL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CIFG and NBIL have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CIFG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CIFG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for NBIL.

CIFG and NBIL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CIFG and 1.50% for NBIL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIFG and NBIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer