CIBR vs. IMMR

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) is Cybersecurity fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index, while IMMR (Immersion Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, CIBR returned 18.11%/yr vs -0.41%/yr for IMMR. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CIBR vs. IMMR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and Immersion Corporation (IMMR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIBR achieves a 28.80% return, which is significantly higher than IMMR's -2.12% return. Over the past 10 years, CIBR has outperformed IMMR with an annualized return of 18.11%, while IMMR has yielded a comparatively lower -0.41% annualized return.

CIBR

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: 8.67%
• 6M: 27.98%
• YTD: 28.80%
• 1Y: 24.35%
• 3Y*: 26.64%
• 5Y*: 14.23%
• 10Y*: 18.11%
• ALL TIME*: 15.45%

IMMR

• 1D: -2.06%
• 1M: -2.64%
• 6M: 1.39%
• YTD: -2.12%
• 1Y: -14.13%
• 3Y*: 1.05%
• 5Y*: -1.45%
• 10Y*: -0.41%
• ALL TIME*: -3.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIBR vs. IMMR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	28.80%	13.06%	18.21%	39.71%	-26.46%	19.67%	50.53%	28.52%	1.47%	18.61%
IMMR Immersion Corporation	-2.12%	-18.30%	26.47%	3.43%	23.12%	-49.42%	51.95%	-17.08%	26.91%	-33.58%

Correlation

The correlation between CIBR and IMMR is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.36
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2015	0.42

Return for Risk

CIBR vs. IMMR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIBR

CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 32
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 34
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 26

IMMR

IMMR Risk / Return Rank: 25
IMMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
IMMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
IMMR Omega Ratio Rank: 28
IMMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
IMMR Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIBR vs. IMMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and Immersion Corporation (IMMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CIBR	IMMR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.95	-0.35	+1.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.45	-0.26	+1.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	0.97	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.11	-0.56	+1.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.58	-1.22	+3.79

CIBR vs. IMMR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIBR Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is higher than the IMMR Sharpe Ratio of -0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIBR and IMMR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CIBR vs. IMMR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIBR drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, smaller than the maximum IMMR drawdown of -98.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIBR and IMMR.

Drawdown Indicators

	CIBR	IMMR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.89%	-98.66%	+64.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.99%	-25.48%	+3.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.99%	-56.90%	+34.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.89%	-56.90%	+23.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.89%	-74.29%	+40.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.10%	-89.91%	+86.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.63%	-88.21%	+79.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.48%	15.11%	-5.63%

Volatility

CIBR vs. IMMR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) is 7.70%, while Immersion Corporation (IMMR) has a volatility of 11.39%. This indicates that CIBR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CIBR	IMMR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.70%	11.39%	-3.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.49%	27.95%	-5.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.82%	40.69%	-14.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.25%	45.82%	-20.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.62%	50.93%	-27.31%

Dividends

CIBR vs. IMMR - Dividend Comparison

CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than IMMR's 4.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	0.43%	0.42%	0.29%	0.42%	0.31%	0.59%	1.10%	0.23%	0.23%	0.10%	0.77%	0.58%
IMMR Immersion Corporation	4.90%	5.59%	2.06%	3.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CIBR and IMMR in my portfolio?

CIBR and IMMR have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CIBR or IMMR?

IMMR has higher volatility (11.39%) compared to CIBR (7.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIBR dropped -33.89% vs IMMR's -98.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CIBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.