CERS vs. ACU
CERS (Cerus Corporation) and ACU (Acme United Corporation) are both stocks. CERS operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while ACU operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, CERS returned -8.07%/yr vs 11.55%/yr for ACU. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CERS vs. ACU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CERS achieves a 26.21% return, which is significantly higher than ACU's 12.66% return. Over the past 10 years, CERS has underperformed ACU with an annualized return of -8.07%, while ACU has yielded a comparatively higher 11.55% annualized return.
CERS
- 1D
- -3.70%
- 1M
- -4.06%
- YTD
- 26.21%
- 6M
- 22.64%
- 1Y
- 94.03%
- 3Y*
- 2.70%
- 5Y*
- -14.53%
- 10Y*
- -8.07%
ACU
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 6.90%
- YTD
- 12.66%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- 1Y
- 17.01%
- 3Y*
- 22.98%
- 5Y*
- 2.06%
- 10Y*
- 11.55%
CERS vs. ACU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CERS Cerus Corporation | 26.21% | 33.77% | -28.70% | -40.82% | -46.40% | -1.59% | 63.98% | -16.77% | 50.00% | -22.30% |
ACU Acme United Corporation | 12.66% | 9.67% | -11.61% | 100.21% | -33.82% | 13.48% | 29.39% | 71.41% | -37.83% | -6.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between CERS and ACU is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 1997 | 0.07 |
Over the past year, CERS and ACU have become more correlated (0.36) than their long-term average of 0.07, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
CERS:
$504.77M
ACU:
$187.31M
CERS:
-$0.05
ACU:
$2.07
CERS:
2.30
ACU:
1.23
CERS:
7.39
ACU:
1.60K
CERS:
$216.56M
ACU:
$150.64M
CERS:
$114.76M
ACU:
$59.51M
CERS:
-$2.69M
ACU:
$17.53M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CERS vs. ACU — Risk / Return Rank
CERS
ACU
CERS vs. ACU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cerus Corporation (CERS) and Acme United Corporation (ACU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CERS | ACU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.12 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | 0.85 | +1.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.71 | 2.00 | +3.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CERS vs. ACU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CERS drawdown since its inception was -99.28%, which is greater than ACU's maximum drawdown of -91.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CERS and ACU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CERS | ACU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.28% | -91.05% | -8.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.32% | -20.05% | -18.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.21% | -32.71% | -29.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.37% | -51.48% | -33.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.45% | -52.47% | -33.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.77% | -6.81% | -89.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.40% | -38.91% | -42.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.53% | 8.53% | +8.00% |
Volatility
CERS vs. ACU - Volatility Comparison
Cerus Corporation (CERS) has a higher volatility of 15.56% compared to Acme United Corporation (ACU) at 7.11%. This indicates that CERS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CERS | ACU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.56% | 7.11% | +8.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.96% | 19.47% | +34.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.47% | 31.96% | +43.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.80% | 40.38% | +29.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.20% | 42.39% | +20.81% |
Dividends
CERS vs. ACU - Dividend Comparison
CERS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACU Acme United Corporation | 1.42% | 1.54% | 1.61% | 1.31% | 2.47% | 1.54% | 1.59% | 2.02% | 3.09% | 1.79% | 1.56% | 2.07% |
CERS Cerus Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CERS vs. ACU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cerus Corporation and Acme United Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CERS vs. ACU - Profitability Comparison
CERS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cerus Corporation reported a gross profit of 27.89M and revenue of 53.66M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.0%.
ACU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acme United Corporation reported a gross profit of 20.79K and revenue of 52.30K. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.7%.
CERS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cerus Corporation reported an operating income of -354.00K and revenue of 53.66M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.7%.
ACU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acme United Corporation reported an operating income of 1.75K and revenue of 52.30K, resulting in an operating margin of 3.3%.
CERS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cerus Corporation reported a net income of -1.64M and revenue of 53.66M, resulting in a net margin of -3.1%.
ACU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acme United Corporation reported a net income of 985.00 and revenue of 52.30K, resulting in a net margin of 1.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CERS and ACU have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CERS has higher volatility (15.56%) compared to ACU (7.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CERS dropped -99.28% vs ACU's -91.05%.
CERS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CERS and ACU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer